Search for: "MATTER OF STATE OF NY v. King" Results 101 - 120 of 248
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Apr 2015, 4:57 pm by Stephen Bilkis
McGowan, 2002 NY SlipOp 40330(U), at 3 [Crim Ct., Richmond County 2002]; People v. [read post]
14 Oct 2013, 2:51 pm by Neil Cahn
Pagones (and Judge of the Surrogate’s Court) in Antony T. v. [read post]
15 Jun 2011, 9:00 am by McNabb Associates, P.C.
ARTICLE V Extradition shall not be granted in any of the following circumstances: 1. [read post]
29 Apr 2008, 1:18 am
NYS Division of Human Rights KINGS COUNTYMotor Vehicles City Rules Supersede State Law; Federal Express Fails to Show Double Parking for Delivery, Pickup Yavkina v. [read post]
21 Feb 2019, 6:04 am by Hillary Frommer
” “Residence,” on the other hand, just means “living in a particular place” (see King v Car Rentals, Inc., 29 AD3d 205, 210 [2d Dept 2006], quoting Matter of Newcomb, 192 NY 238 [1908]). [read post]
12 Jun 2013, 1:24 pm
The defendant is a New York State Assemblyman and a chairman of the Executive Committee of the Kings County Democratic Party (KCDC). [read post]
17 Dec 2014, 5:32 am
New York State Office of Mental Retardation & Dev. [read post]
5 Jul 2022, 3:28 am by Peter Mahler
The Case of the Vague Virgule Lengyel-Fushimi v Rothfus, 2022 NY Slip Op 30809(U) [Sup Ct Kings County Mar. 10, 2022], a case this blog previously featured here, involves a multi-faceted dispute among the non-managing Class B and Class C members and the Class A managing members of a successful Brooklyn beer brewery and taproom. [read post]
9 Aug 2013, 7:00 am by Spencer L. Reames
 This rule has its genesis in the Court of Appeals decision of Riggs v Palmer, in which the Court stated “[n]o one shall be permitted to profit by his own fraud, or to take advantage of his own wrong, or to found any claim upon his own iniquity, or to acquire property by his own crime” (Riggs v Palmer, 115 NY 506, 511 [1889]). [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 1:56 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Siegel, 1986 Supp Practice Commentaries, McKinney's Cons Laws of NY, Book 7B, CPLR C3101:9, at 4; Rep No. 95 of Comm on State Legis, Bill Jacket, L 1985, ch 294 at 16). [read post]
25 Apr 2016, 5:53 am by SHG
  And in the case raised by Andrew, Welch v. [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 4:00 am by Peter A. Mahler
Further, contrary to the petitioners' contention, the law does not limit the application of a lack of marketability discount to the goodwill of a corporation in all instances (see Matter of Brooklyn Home Dialysis Training Ctr., 293 AD2d 747; Hall v King, 265 AD2d 244, 245; Lehman v Piontkowski, 203 AD2d 257, 259; Matter of Raskin v Walter Karl, Inc., 129 AD2d 642, 644; Matter of Joy Wholesale Sundries, 125 AD2d 310; Matter… [read post]