Search for: "MATTER OF T B" Results 101 - 120 of 19,993
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Sep 2011, 8:18 am by Evidence ProfBlogger
Like its federal counterpart, Arkansas Rule of Evidence 901(b)(1) provides that a party can authenticate evidence through the "[t]estimony of a witness with knowledge that a matter is what it is claimed to be. [read post]
24 Aug 2011, 3:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
The Board then stated:[4] In summary, the board finds that claim 1 of both requests relates to the technical implementation of excluded matter in the form of game rules. [read post]
23 Mar 2018, 6:08 am
It don’t matter.'"And the starlet wasn't giving the men supporting #MeToo much credit, telling Cosmo: 'These producers and directors, they’re not woke, they’re scared.'AND: I had not seen the term "video vixen" before. [read post]
8 Aug 2013, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
Therefore, the knowledge of the method and the conditions for determining the parameter is required for the parameter to be unambiguously defined (see T 412/02 [5.8-9]). [read post]
1 Feb 2019, 1:13 am by Roel van Woudenberg
The examining division held that the subject-matter of claim 1 of the main request and auxiliary requests 1 and 3 to 5 was excluded from patentability pursuant to Article 53(b) EPC as it constituted an essentially biological process for the production of plants. [read post]
24 May 2024, 5:35 pm by Daniel M. Kowalski
See Matter of C-G-T-, 28 I&N Dec. 740, 745 (BIA 2023) (explaining that “when considering future harm, adjudicators should not expect a respondent to hide” the respondent’s sexual orientation). [read post]
18 Aug 2020, 3:20 am
The name’s Joe.Cardi B: (00:14)Well hello there Joe.Joe Biden: (00:16)Hi, [crosstalk 00:00:16] as a matter of fact, watch me and my daughter. [read post]
17 Dec 2013, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
” (emphasis added by the board).[2.2.4] It follows from this that the appeal proceedings are confined to the subject-matter of the first instance proceedings and therefore that the statement of grounds of appeal should at least discuss this subject-matter. [read post]
1 Feb 2022, 12:32 am by Roel van Woudenberg
An assignment of the priority rights of the inventors Wang and Zhong to the appellant or the University of Western Ontario had not taken place prior to the filing of the PCT application.The subject-matter of claim 1 (thus) lacked novelty over the disclosure in documents D20 and D21.Considering document D21 as representing the closest prior art, the subject-matter of claim 1 of auxiliary request 1 lacked an inventive step.The subject-matter of claim 1 of auxiliary request 2… [read post]
The Board wasn’t convinced by Patentee’s arguments and found added matter based on several interesting legal points. [read post]
11 Feb 2016, 6:47 am
Respondent’s further arguments regarding matters other than the legal sufficiency of the claims were superfluous.Respondent’s arguments were in the nature of defenses, but the standard for considering a Rule 12(B)(6) motion whether the complaint states a plausible claim for relief. [read post]
31 Mar 2020, 5:21 am by Charles Sartain
The Court concluded that circumstances surrounding the transaction didn’t matter. [read post]
17 Jun 2013, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
(b) Decision T 893/90 concerns the use of a composition for controlling bleeding in non-hemophilic mammals as compared to the use of the same composition for controlling bleeding in hemophilic subjects. [read post]
23 Nov 2020, 2:48 am by Liz Dunshee
On Friday, the Corp Fin Staff updated its statement on use of electronic signatures in light of Covid-19 concerns to say that it would not recommend enforcement action with respect to Reg S-T signature requirements for companies that comply with amended Rule 302(b) in advance of the effective date. [read post]
11 Aug 2013, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
However, such a lack of clarity can be taken into account when the subject-matter of such a claim is examined as to its novelty and inventive step.[2.5] As a consequence, the reasons invoked based on A 100(b) are not sufficient for establishing that the patent cannot be maintained on the basis of the main request. [read post]