Search for: "MATTER OF W C"
Results 101 - 120
of 3,944
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Jan 2021, 1:00 am
The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: Keefe (by his litigation friend Eyton) v Hoteles Pinero Canarias SL, heard 7 Mar 2017 Arcadia Petroleum Ltd & Ors v Bosworth & Anor, heard 10-11 Apr 2017 In the matter of an application by Anthony McIntyre for Judicial Review (Northern Ireland), heard 24 October 2019 In the matter of XY (AP) (Scotland), heard 13- 14 November 2019 R v Hilton (Northern Ireland), heard 2 December 2019 MacDonald & Anor v Cambroe… [read post]
14 Dec 2020, 1:00 am
The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: Keefe (by his litigation friend Eyton) v Hoteles Pinero Canarias SL, heard 7 Mar 2017 Arcadia Petroleum Ltd & Ors v Bosworth & Anor, heard 10-11 Apr 2017 In the matter of an application by Anthony McIntyre for Judicial Review (Northern Ireland), heard 24 October 2019 In the matter of XY (AP) (Scotland), heard 13- 14 November 2019 R v Hilton (Northern Ireland), heard 2 December 2019 MacDonald & Anor v Cambroe… [read post]
1 Feb 2021, 1:00 am
The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: Keefe (by his litigation friend Eyton) v Hoteles Pinero Canarias SL, heard 7 Mar 2017 Arcadia Petroleum Ltd & Ors v Bosworth & Anor, heard 10-11 Apr 2017 In the matter of an application by Anthony McIntyre for Judicial Review (Northern Ireland), heard 24 October 2019 In the matter of XY (AP) (Scotland), heard 13- 14 November 2019 R v Hilton (Northern Ireland), heard 2 December 2019 MacDonald & Anor v Cambroe… [read post]
8 Feb 2021, 1:00 am
The second is T W Logistics Ltd v Essex County Council & Anor. [read post]
3 Dec 2011, 6:30 am
Gagnon, No. 110754 c/w Gagnon v. [read post]
20 Dec 2018, 6:09 am
Philipp WideraIn light of the Teva/Gilead-judgment handed down on 25 July 2018 by the CJEU (C-121/17) as well as the latest referral from the German Federal Patent Court dated 17 October 2017 in re Sitagliptin III (14 W (pat) 12/17), which is pending as C-650/17, Prof. [read post]
30 Jul 2019, 1:38 pm
False advertising: defendants argued that its C&D letters weren’t commercial speech or advertising for purposes of the Lanham Act and the allegedly false statements on Defendants’ website didn’t directly disparage Matonis; neither argument succeeded.Under the Gordon & Breach test (which, as a reminder, has a prong requiring “commercial competition” that doesn’t survive Lexmark, though that doesn’t matter here), these particular… [read post]
3 Aug 2010, 1:55 pm
R. 4:42-9(a)(1); R. 5:3-5(c); Williams v. [read post]
27 Oct 2020, 12:35 pm
C. [read post]
5 Apr 2019, 5:58 am
Klemash, Jamie C. [read post]
14 May 2012, 2:25 am
This is another challenge to the test for exclusion under Art1 F(c). [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 2:11 am
In the Matter of S (a child), heard 20 February 2012. [read post]
11 Feb 2017, 7:09 am
Technically about different subject matter requirement but important b/c Rich equates configuration with 3-D design and then says the water is ok. [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 1:03 pm
Law Lessons from IN THE MATTER OF THE ESTATE OF GEORGIA TSAIRIS, deceased, ESX-CP-0070-2009 & ESX-C-245-08, Walter Koprowski, Jr., J.S.C., May 31, 2011: The doctrine of equitable estoppel is founded on the fundamental duty of fair dealing. [read post]
13 Apr 2018, 1:05 pm
First, should we provide limited remedies for functional matter under 43(a)? [read post]
18 Feb 2019, 1:00 am
On Wednesday 20 February, the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council will hear the appeal of C v C (Jersey). [read post]
16 Oct 2017, 1:00 am
In the matter of C (Children), heard 9-10 Oct 2017. [read post]
31 Jul 2013, 6:17 am
Schleyer and Kathryn C. [read post]
22 Nov 2015, 3:00 am
R (C) v Secretary of State for Justice, heard 26 October 2015. [read post]
19 Oct 2020, 1:00 am
The appeal considered whether notice to an applicant of revocation of a sponsor’s licence in respect of his or her Tier 2 (General) Migrant application is required as a matter of procedural fairness. [read post]
