Search for: "MK case"
Results 101 - 120
of 183
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Nov 2013, 3:30 pm
Barking had assessed her date of birth to be 4 June 1993 and that assessment was taken as correct in this case, though MK claimed to be two years younger.She had been living with her aunt, Ms A, and her aunt’s two young children. [read post]
17 Oct 2013, 2:40 pm
Recently Mr Justice Burton, newly appointed head of the IPT, hinted this week at a willingness to open the court up to more accountability by listing cases to be heard in public. [read post]
17 Oct 2013, 2:40 pm
Recently Mr Justice Burton, newly appointed head of the IPT, hinted this week at a willingness to open the court up to more accountability by listing cases to be heard in public. [read post]
18 Jul 2013, 10:32 pm
Four years later, Notaro resigned and joined a competitor, MK Precision, LLC, and Pulse sued to enforce the non-compete agreement. [read post]
5 Apr 2013, 7:03 am
The caption of the case? [read post]
1 Apr 2013, 6:11 am
In enjoining the arbitration, the 4th Circuit noted that no contractual relationship existed between the Defendants and MK - the Defendants had not purchased the funds through an IPO but in a secondary market transaction from Legg Mason, a FINRA member unaffiliated with MK. [read post]
1 Apr 2013, 1:11 am
In enjoining the arbitration, the 4th Circuit noted that no contractual relationship existed between the Defendants and MK – the Defendants had not purchased the funds through an IPO but in a secondary market transaction from Legg Mason, a FINRA member unaffiliated with MK. [read post]
26 Mar 2013, 11:00 pm
In enjoining the arbitration, the 4th Circuit noted that no contractual relationship existed between the Defendants and MK - the Defendants had not purchased the funds through an IPO but in a secondary market transaction from Legg Mason, a FINRA member unaffiliated with MK. [read post]
17 Sep 2012, 1:24 am
In any event, the Court of Appeal stated that Andrew Smith J's decision was plainly correct and that a single arbitrator should have been appointed.This case highlights the consistent approach of the English courts in seeking to minimise appeals arising from arbitrations under the Act. [read post]
16 Jul 2012, 12:49 am
You can also find our table of human rights cases here and previous roundups here. [read post]
12 Jul 2012, 10:51 am
Sorock GS, Quigley PA, Rutledge MK et al. [read post]
25 Jun 2012, 8:29 am
The magistrates and judges are respectful: receptive, polite and showing a real interest in the cases. [read post]
30 May 2012, 4:12 pm
The DOJ press release on this case indicates that the parent company, MKS Instruments, Inc., is not a target of any investigation in this matter. [read post]
25 May 2012, 1:15 pm
In many cases, people simply forgot they had these items. [read post]
24 May 2012, 2:48 am
Published annually, the Journal comprises separate sections for articles, essays, case comments, legislative comments and book reviews. [read post]
15 May 2012, 3:33 pm
” MK About the Editors: The Virginia (VA) trucking accident attorneys at Shapiro, Lewis & Appleton have experience handling truck accident cases in Virginia, North Carolina (NC), and other Southeastern states. [read post]
25 Apr 2012, 12:16 pm
In MK that discovery occurred only when the applicant entered therapy. [read post]
23 Apr 2012, 7:24 am
MK About the Editors: The Virginia (VA) trucking accident attorneys at Shapiro, Lewis & Appleton have experience handling truck accident cases in Virginia, North Carolina (NC), and other Southeastern states. [read post]
8 Mar 2012, 10:00 am
United Kingdom (2001) 33 EHRR 10. 5 For example the claimant in MK (Lesbians) Albania CG [2009] UKAIT 00036 suffered from mental illness which would deteriorate and evidence was adduced of inadequate care in terms of likelihood of a “cure” of homosexuality. 6 Although the distinction drawn in that case between civil and political rights and socioeconomic rights is of note, given that the right in issue involves identity, this should be given due weight in this context. [read post]
19 Feb 2012, 10:29 pm
Z (A child) [2012] EWHC 139 (Fam) is, to my knowledge, the first reported relocation case since MK v CK [2011] EWCA Civ 793.To briefly recap, in MK v CK it was made clear that the only principle to be drawn from Payne v Payne [2001] 1 FLR 1052 - which had skewed relocation decisions for ten years - was the paramountcy principle - everything else was guidance.Returning to Z (A child) :The facts: This case comes with a lot of 'baggage', primarily related… [read post]
