Search for: "MORRIS v. ATTORNEY GENERAL, et al" Results 101 - 115 of 115
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Jul 2009, 7:31 am
Attorney’s Office for the Southern District of New York earlier in their careers. [read post]
1 Nov 2008, 3:12 am
(Ars Technica) CAFC: Co-inventors contribution must be 'more than the exercise of ordinary skill'; NTP awarded attorneys' fees: Oren Tavory v NTP (Patently-O) (Law360) (Law360) (Property, intangible) (Patent Prospector) (Property, intangible) PTO announces no IDS or Markush Rules during Bush Administration (Patent Prospector) (Hal Wegner) (Patently-O) (Patent Docs)   Global Global - General Exploding the intangible asset market cap myth (IP… [read post]
9 Aug 2008, 1:50 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com]   Highlights this week included: The end of William Patry’s blog: (Patry Copyright Blog), (Excess Copyright), (Patently-O), (Chicago IP Litigation Blog), (Michael Geist), (The Fire of Genius), (Techdirt), (Patry Copyright Blog), Kitchin J clarifies scope of biotech patents, in particular gene sequence patents: Eli Lilly & Co v Human Genome Sciences:… [read post]
7 Jul 2008, 5:11 pm
SCOGGINS; from Hidalgo County; 13th district (13-06-00368-CV, ___ SW3d ___, 12-20-07)08-0276 DANIEL ROEHRS, ET AL. v. [read post]
30 May 2008, 2:28 am
Shaw et al"The Fair Foreclosure Act does not permit a lender to recoup from the debtor attorneys' fees and costs incurred between expiration of its notice of intention to foreclose and the filing of the foreclosure complaint. [read post]
19 Apr 2008, 8:50 am
(Laura Empson of Cass Business School gave a particularly nice presentation on this at lunchtime Thursday, positing that useful ways of thinking about partnership might be as analogous to The Three Musketeers, to Henry V's famous "band of brothers" speech before the Battle of Agincourt, to a buccaneer pirate ship, or, at last, to "Gone With the Wind. [read post]
25 Feb 2008, 7:04 am
The case was Philip Morris USA, et al., v. [read post]
12 Jan 2007, 10:34 am
The case is Struhs, et al., v. [read post]
12 Jan 2007, 10:34 am
The case is Struhs, et al., v. [read post]