Search for: "MacFarlane v. MacFarlane" Results 101 - 120 of 152
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Dec 2016, 4:19 pm by INFORRM
 heard 29 and 30 November and 1 December 2016 the Court of Appeal (Macfarlane, Davis and Sharp LJJ). [read post]
11 Jun 2017, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
  Lachaux v Independent Print, heard 29 and 30 November and 1 December 2016 (Macfarlane, Davis and Sharp LJJ). [read post]
14 May 2017, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
On 12 May 2017 Warby J heard an application in the case of Suresh v Samad & ors. [read post]
26 Apr 2011, 7:19 am by James McComish
The facts in Fleming v Marshall [2011] NSWCA 86 were complex and multi-jurisdictional. [read post]
3 May 2011, 1:32 am by Rosalind English
This came to a head in the furore over the former Archbishop of Canterbury’s intervention in the MacFarlane v Relate case, provoking some very sharp words from Lord Justice Laws. [read post]
23 Jul 2017, 4:08 pm by INFORRM
Lachaux v Independent Print, heard 29 and 30 November and 1 December 2016 (Macfarlane, Davis and Sharp LJJ). [read post]
4 Jun 2017, 4:52 pm by INFORRM
The same blog has a post about the decision in Charalambopoulos v. [read post]
31 Jul 2020, 4:00 am by Canadian Forum on Civil Justice
The 2017 decision Pintea v Johns has been heralded as a watershed moment for self-represented litigants in Canada. [read post]
30 Apr 2017, 4:29 pm by INFORRM
  Lachaux v Independent Print, heard 29 and 30 November and 1 December 2016 (Macfarlane, Davis and Sharp LJJ). [read post]
22 Jan 2014, 4:00 am by Colin Lachance
Julie Macfarlane observed that “some SRLs have become fairly competent legal researchers” through extensive use of and hours spent on CanLII. [read post]
29 Jan 2010, 1:30 pm by WIMS
Senator (R-NE); Jonathan Lash, President, World Resources Institute; Allison Macfarlane, Associate Professor of Environmental Science and Policy, George Mason University; Richard A. [read post]
14 May 2008, 9:00 pm
 Ironically perhaps, marijuana was  a theme of my appeal before Judge Ginsburg and the rest of this panel, through my argument about the soundness of federal trial judge Paul Friedman's 2004 ruling in ACLU v. [read post]
12 Feb 2017, 4:06 pm by INFORRM
On the same day Sir David Eady handed down judgment in the case of Daryanani v Ramnani ([2017] EWHC 183 (QB)). [read post]
5 Mar 2016, 2:06 pm by Giles Peaker
“[T]he duty to account is a typical feature of the agent’s position” (Bowstead & Reynolds on Agency, 20th ed., at paragraph 1-032, citing Michelin Tyre Co Ltd v Macfarlane (Glasgow) Ltd [1917] 2 SLT 205); iv) In other respects, too, the usual incidents of agency were missing from the 2000 Agreement. [read post]
5 Feb 2017, 4:04 pm by INFORRM
On Thursday 2 February 2017, Garnham J heard an application in the privacy case of ZXC v Bloomberg LLP. [read post]