Search for: "Manners v. Manners" Results 101 - 120 of 26,116
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 May 2024, 10:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Additionally, petitioner demonstrated that NYCTA had the opportunity to investigate the essential facts in a timely manner, establishing that petitioner's delay did not cause substantial prejudice to NYCTA (see Matter of Mejia v New York City Tr. [read post]
9 May 2024, 10:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Additionally, petitioner demonstrated that NYCTA had the opportunity to investigate the essential facts in a timely manner, establishing that petitioner's delay did not cause substantial prejudice to NYCTA (see Matter of Mejia v New York City Tr. [read post]
9 May 2024, 5:44 am by Patrick Bracher (ZA)
  The court found that the insured had failed to conduct itself in a timely or prudent manner. [read post]
8 May 2024, 12:51 pm by Duana Boswell-Loechel
Using controlled substances in a manner that endangers the child’s health and safety. [read post]
8 May 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
IntegrateNYC, Inc. v State of New York2024 NY Slip Op 02369Decided on May 02, 2024Appellate Division, First DepartmentMoulton, J.Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.Decided and Entered: May 02, 2024 SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION First Judicial DepartmentSallie Manzanet-DanielsPeter H. [read post]
8 May 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
IntegrateNYC, Inc. v State of New York2024 NY Slip Op 02369Decided on May 02, 2024Appellate Division, First DepartmentMoulton, J.Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.Decided and Entered: May 02, 2024 SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION First Judicial DepartmentSallie Manzanet-DanielsPeter H. [read post]
7 May 2024, 3:42 pm by Brian Shiffrin
In People v Reeves (152 AD3d 1173, 1176 [4th Dept 2017]), the Appellate Division, Fourth Department, suppressed identification testimony based on the alleged unreliability of the witness's identification, despite the fact that the identification was not the product of unduly suggestive police procedures. [read post]
7 May 2024, 1:11 pm by Evan Brown
This is the standard applied to content-neutral time, place, and manner restrictions. [read post]
7 May 2024, 1:11 pm by Evan Brown
This is the standard applied to content-neutral time, place, and manner restrictions. [read post]
7 May 2024, 9:31 am by Daniel M. Kowalski
§ 214.2(h)(4)(iii)(A) contemplate the combination of two degrees in such a manner. [read post]