Search for: "Marine v. Marine"
Results 101 - 120
of 4,252
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Sep 2023, 8:23 am
Aug. 1, 2023) (Africk). [2] Citing the Fontenot v. [read post]
13 Sep 2023, 6:00 am
In 1972, the per se flood crested in U.S. v. [read post]
13 Sep 2023, 5:56 am
As for IHRL, plaintiffs pointed to the right to life under the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR), and the UN Human Rights Committee’s ruling in AS v. [read post]
12 Sep 2023, 4:52 am
In Cooling v. [read post]
12 Sep 2023, 3:00 am
American federal trial judges are generally best of the breed lawyers. [read post]
11 Sep 2023, 3:00 am
Travelers Home & Marine Ins. [read post]
10 Sep 2023, 9:03 am
Burke V. [read post]
7 Sep 2023, 1:18 pm
Co. v. [read post]
27 Aug 2023, 3:41 pm
See Mariner LDC v. [read post]
23 Aug 2023, 4:47 am
In McCollum v. [read post]
22 Aug 2023, 3:37 pm
From McCollum v. [read post]
16 Aug 2023, 1:01 pm
U.S. v. [read post]
16 Aug 2023, 7:00 am
(Particularly following the Supreme Court’s 1983 decision in INS v. [read post]
14 Aug 2023, 12:29 am
Special thanks to Charlotte Lee, Intern for her contributions to this article. [1] Public Prosecutor v Loh Cheok San [2023] SGHC 190. [2] https://www.cpib.gov.sg/press-room/press-releases/bunkering-company-and-staff-charged-cheating-and-disguising-benefits. [3] Prime Shipping Corp v Public Prosecutor [2021] 4 SLR 795, citing Tom-Reck Security Services Pte Ltd v Public Prosecutor [2001] 1 SLR(R) 327. [read post]
10 Aug 2023, 2:23 pm
Poet Theatricals Marine, LLC v. [read post]
10 Aug 2023, 6:00 am
On Friday, August 4, 2023, the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts granted summary judgment in favor of the National Marine Fisheries Service (“NMFS”) in the case of Melone v. [read post]
9 Aug 2023, 8:34 am
The CA considered the principles applicable to interpreting the Colregs (as set out by the UK Supreme Court in Evergreen Marine (UK) Limited v Nautical Challenge Ltd [2021] UKSC 6) and held that Rule 9(a) of the Colregs embodies the Limit Requirement for the following reasons: a) The ordinary meaning of the wording in Rule 9(a) is different from the Old Rule 25(a) because: the scope of Rule 9(a) is not limited to just power-driven vessels;the obligation in Rule 9(a) now applies… [read post]
8 Aug 2023, 6:00 am
The question was whether insurers could refuse to pay a claim under an All Risks Marine Cargo Open Policy because the insured had no insurable interest in the subject matter of the property cargos of grain. [read post]
7 Aug 2023, 9:12 pm
In Brown Shoe v. [read post]
