Search for: "Mark C. Rogers"
Results 101 - 120
of 489
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Dec 2011, 10:10 pm
§ 1125(c), if it can prove that the mark is “famous. [read post]
18 Mar 2020, 3:55 am
Rogers and Deputy Chief Judge Mark A. [read post]
15 Jan 2009, 6:49 am
Yalof, and Mark Hugo Lopez. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 4:34 am
Jennifer Davis: class consciousness among judges in English law of 19th c. [read post]
30 Jan 2015, 5:30 am
Authored by Judge Roger Vinson (a district court judge who has since left the FISC), the pair were handed to the Times in response to a FOIA lawsuit. [read post]
22 Nov 2022, 6:50 am
§ 1125(c)(3)(A)(ii). [read post]
9 Sep 2009, 11:21 am
Gherty, Mark J. [read post]
2 Aug 2011, 1:48 pm
Evans, Judith C. [read post]
28 Jul 2014, 7:31 am
Earlier decision held TCF’s infringement of Comic’s trade marks, and Roger Wyand QC is now called to decide whether and how the claimant's requests for injunction, destruction of infringing materials, account of profits, disclosure of information, publicity order, and interim payment should be granted. [read post]
19 Jun 2012, 7:08 am
LV conceded that WB’s use of the mark was noncommercial, making it an “artistic work” for Rogers purposes. [read post]
20 Mar 2022, 1:36 pm
Michael C. [read post]
10 Apr 2013, 3:23 am
., Cancellation No. 92055285 (March 22, 2013) [precedential].Petitioner filed and served an expert disclosure statement identifying one Roger Holder as an "unretained expert" pursuant to TBMP Section 401.03 and FRCP 26(a)(2)(C). [read post]
10 Mar 2011, 6:47 pm
– AG opinion in Case C? [read post]
26 Jun 2017, 12:04 pm
That’s what Chief Judge Roger Gregory of the Fourth Circuit described as the “marginalization and exclusion” of Muslims around the United States. [read post]
13 Apr 2018, 10:31 am
[I teach this as courts wanting to have their cake and eat it: they routinely assert both normative and descriptive limits, e.g., in justifying Rogers v. [read post]
7 Dec 2022, 10:37 am
§ 1125(c)(3)(C). [read post]
8 Nov 2023, 1:26 pm
VIP Products, the Court held that it did not need to apply or even decide the validity of a speech-protective limit on trademark law designed to prevent trademark owners from shutting down expressive works that comment on trademarks, known as the Rogers test. [read post]
27 Nov 2022, 11:03 am
§ 1125(c)(3)(A)(ii). [read post]
15 Jan 2010, 10:11 am
Bauer, Thomas Karon, Mark Reyes, David E. [read post]
12 Feb 2010, 11:50 am
Pearson, Andy Arneson, Mark Holly, Gregory Perkkio, Arlene M. [read post]
