Search for: "Mark Harms"
Results 101 - 120
of 10,251
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 May 2024, 7:07 pm
” And with losing wagers, the court explained, the bettors sustained no harm. [read post]
2 May 2024, 2:27 pm
The complaint alleged that Meta's management, driven by Mark Zuckerberg's control, maximizes user engagement and profits at the cost of user safety and the economy. [read post]
2 May 2024, 7:13 am
UMG has been leading the industry in addressing AI’s potentially harmful effects while embracing its opportunities. [read post]
1 May 2024, 8:59 am
Generally, the receiving party wants to narrow the definition to items marked Confidential Information to limit the risks it undertakes. [read post]
1 May 2024, 6:23 am
Discrete features of boot design lacked distinctiveness necessary for trademark. 231150.P.pdf (uscourts.gov) Even a little harm from discriminatory change in work suffices under Title VII. 22-193_q86b.pdf (supremecourt.gov) Delay in bringing suit for trademark infringement until after limitations would have expired under state-law analog to Lanham Act required presumption that laches barred claim. 231273p.pdf (uscourts.gov) In class action over false claim that products aided… [read post]
30 Apr 2024, 12:32 pm
Marks, Ricardo M. [read post]
30 Apr 2024, 10:28 am
The Court of Appeals affirmed sanctions against Egilman’s co-conspirator, for what the court described as “brazen” conduct.[5] Despite being a confessed contemnor, Egilman managed to attract a fair amount of hagiographic commentary.[6] An article in Science, described Egilman as “the scourge of companies he accuses of harming public health and corrupting science,”[7] and quoted fawning praise from his lawsuit industry employers: “[h]e’s a… [read post]
30 Apr 2024, 6:50 am
It is, of course, possible to distinguish even this crappy legal work product from AI training, but you can see that the harm is already done. [read post]
29 Apr 2024, 5:31 pm
Even as we express concern about the harms caused by corporations and their increasing wealth and power, so many of our hopes and desires are bound up with corporations. [read post]
29 Apr 2024, 5:11 pm
At The Law Offices of Mark C. [read post]
29 Apr 2024, 2:34 pm
Additionally, individuals frequenting beaches along the coastal areas wherein many condominiums may be located are also encouraged to be mindful of sea turtle nesting areas, many of which may be marked by designated signs or other markings. [read post]
29 Apr 2024, 12:09 pm
On March 28, 2024, the Office of Management and Budget (“OMB”) issued Memorandum M-24-10, Advancing Governance, Innovation, and Risk Management for Agency Use of Artificial Intelligence (the “Memo”). [read post]
29 Apr 2024, 5:41 am
Yahel Vilan, the Israeli ambassador to Serbia, recently told the Russian State-owned news agency Sputnik that applying the term “genocide” to the July 1995 mass killings of more than 8,000 Bosnian Muslim (Bosniak) men and boys in and around the town of Srebrenica in eastern Bosnia presented a distorted picture of the events in question. [read post]
28 Apr 2024, 3:10 pm
However, an exemption was marked out for anyone receiving or performing such surgery to correct a birth defect. [read post]
27 Apr 2024, 2:02 pm
This was decided in the FTC’s favor by at least one appellate panel, but the Supreme Court has not yet placed its mark on the issue. [read post]
26 Apr 2024, 9:35 pm
Mark DeBard was an important early proponent of sedation, believing it could be used in rare cases when officers encountered extremely agitated people who needed rapid medical treatment. [read post]
26 Apr 2024, 8:34 am
Mark Wiletsky by Mark Wiletsky Can an employee sue under Title VII to challenge a lateral transfer, even if the transfer does not result in a loss of pay? [read post]
26 Apr 2024, 3:51 am
“The threat of future harm, not yet realized, is not enough. [read post]
25 Apr 2024, 6:55 am
Remembering those workers who have died from bodily harm sustained on the job, as well as their grieving loved ones, is extremely important. [read post]
25 Apr 2024, 5:00 am
In 2024, we mark the 70th anniversary of this historic decision by looking back on the case’s procedural history and sharing the resources available at the Library of Congress for further research. [read post]
