Search for: "Mark Smith v. State"
Results 101 - 120
of 1,571
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Dec 2023, 8:47 pm
Smith v. [read post]
7 Feb 2013, 9:11 am
Smith v. [read post]
23 May 2018, 11:32 am
Adidas America, Inc. v. [read post]
3 Mar 2017, 7:14 am
By Mark S. [read post]
13 Feb 2009, 7:00 am
(C.D.Cal. 2008) 2008 WL 4690536 Watson-Smith v. [read post]
7 Sep 2021, 6:57 am
Smith & Nephew, which stated that certain statutory restrictions on the USPTO’s oversight of the administrative judges of the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (“PTAB”) violated the Appointments Clause of the U.S. [read post]
7 Sep 2021, 6:57 am
Smith & Nephew, which stated that certain statutory restrictions on the USPTO’s oversight of the administrative judges of the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (“PTAB”) violated the Appointments Clause of the U.S. [read post]
13 Dec 2013, 5:01 am
The decisionThe IPO’s decision focused on the words of section 3(1)(b) of the Trade Marks Act 1994, which states that “trade marks which are devoid of any distinctive character” -- an absolute bar to registration that comes from Article 3(1)(b) of the Trade Mark Directive and is paralleled in Article 7(1)(b) of the Community Trade Mark Regulation.The Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) in Case C-37/03 BioID v OHIM… [read post]
25 Feb 2020, 4:02 am
Today the justices will hear argument in one case, United States v. [read post]
4 Mar 2007, 5:10 am
State v. [read post]
10 May 2010, 12:42 pm
Moreover, Judge Kendall decided that the use of Houlihan’s mark to identify it as the subject of the posters’ criticism was protected by Justice Holmes’ opinion in Prestonettes v. [read post]
7 Oct 2011, 8:12 am
On September 8, 2011, members of the United States Congress passed the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act (H.R. 1249) with a vote of 88-9, without amendment to the House bill passed in late June. [read post]
5 Feb 2010, 2:14 am
Smith states that she "had always been remembered amongst associates as the Georgia Peach with the perfect butt. [read post]
4 Nov 2013, 9:32 am
Smith and his supervisor, Lieutenant V. [read post]
25 Jan 2012, 7:07 am
Monday’s decision in United States v. [read post]
12 Dec 2022, 4:16 pm
" Colorado would have to show that prosecuting Smith was "necessary" to promote a "compelling" state interest. [read post]
18 Apr 2022, 3:00 am
” Smith v. [read post]
26 Feb 2020, 8:25 am
Yesterday the Supreme Court heard argument in United States v. [read post]
28 Dec 2023, 4:43 pm
I’m hoping to write more in a few days on the Arizona and SG briefs in Smith v. [read post]
16 Jun 2023, 2:02 pm
Term Limits v. [read post]
