Search for: "Mark Toy" Results 101 - 120 of 1,367
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 May 2023, 4:15 am by Elizabeth Milsark
” VIP Products, on the other hand, has maintained its stance that the use of its “Bad Spaniels” name and mark “does not infringe or dilute any claimed trademark rights,” and that the at-issue dog toy bears design elements that “make it clear that the product is a parody. [read post]
18 May 2023, 4:21 am
Adlin) [Opposition to registration of the mark V COTEACHER & Design for writing instruments, educational toys for teaching math principles, and for educational services, namely web-based learning instruction, in view of the registered mark COTEACHER for “licensing of software in the framework of software publishing. [read post]
16 May 2023, 1:51 pm by Meg Tierney (US)
(“UTH”) applied to register the mark RAPUNZEL for dolls and toys in Class 28 in November 2017. [read post]
16 May 2023, 1:51 pm by Meg Tierney (US)
(“UTH”) applied to register the mark RAPUNZEL for dolls and toys in Class 28 in November 2017. [read post]
9 May 2023, 2:01 pm by Kevin Bercimuelle-Chamot
In its decision, the General Court considered ‘gymnastic and sporting articles’ and ‘games and toys’ dissimilar for the purpose of likelihood of confusion assessment. [read post]
8 May 2023, 9:58 am by Marcel Pemsel
The CJEU held in Adam Opel that the use of a car manufacturer’s trade mark on model cars, registered for cars and toys, can constitute trade mark infringement. [read post]
8 May 2023, 7:10 am
Unsurprisingly, the Board dismissed Professor Rebecca Curtin's opposition to registration of the mark RAPUNZEL for dolls and toy figures, finding that Curtin, as a mere consumer of fairytale-themed products, failed to prove her entitlement to a statutory cause of action. [read post]
1 May 2023, 11:20 am by Nedim Malovic
KG (the opponent) filed an opposition pursuant to Articles 8(1)(b), 8(4) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 (EUTMR).The opponent claimed that there was a likelihood of confusion, on the basis of its following earlier marks:Mark 1: International word mark SIMBA registered for goods in Class 28 (Toys, with the exception of soft toy animals, games’);Mark 2: International figurative mark for goods in Class 28 (Toys, excluding soft-padded cloth… [read post]
24 Apr 2023, 10:20 am by DONALD SCARINCI
The Ninth Circuit reversed, holding that VIP’s First Amendment interest in using Jack Daniel’s trademarks as its own marks on funny dog toys conferred special protection from infringement claims. [read post]
9 Apr 2023, 8:44 am by Benjamin Goh
Kevin Bercimuelle-Chamot commented on the EUIPO Board of Appeal’s ruling that the owner of trade mark for rabbit-like character called Miffy could oppose registration of a similar mark for sex toys due to tarnishment of reputation. [read post]
6 Apr 2023, 7:58 am by Kevin Bercimuelle-Chamot
Furthermore, her appearance has remained constant, her fame has surpassed that of her creator, and she has a strong presence in the world of clothing and toys marketed in brands with a strong presence in the Netherlands. [read post]
31 Mar 2023, 4:00 am by Heather Gray-Grant
This meant that as more Associates hit that 8–9-year mark, more Partners were created. [read post]
The decision concerned an opposition based on prior marks SIMBA and  , in class 28, and the protection of the company name Simba Toys GmbH & Co. [read post]
27 Mar 2023, 1:38 pm by Felicia Boyd (US)
Jack Daniel’s argues that the Ninth Circuit’s ruling places a potential infringer’s free-speech rights above those of a trademark holder, and that this protection will give “copycats free license to prey on unsuspecting consumers and mark holders. [read post]
27 Mar 2023, 1:38 pm by Felicia Boyd (US)
Jack Daniel’s argues that the Ninth Circuit’s ruling places a potential infringer’s free-speech rights above those of a trademark holder, and that this protection will give “copycats free license to prey on unsuspecting consumers and mark holders. [read post]
24 Mar 2023, 10:45 am by Rebecca Tushnet
[I admit that the Court seemed to think that T-shirts were different from dog toys.] [read post]
23 Mar 2023, 1:27 pm by Ronald Mann
Kagan suggested that the toy was “an ordinary commercial product using a mark as a source identifier. [read post]
23 Mar 2023, 11:40 am by Jack Bogdanski
The report was marked as confidential, but since it said what Mikey wanted it to say, he immediately made it public.Even the milquetoasts at the O weren't impressed. [read post]