Search for: "Mark v. Wish" Results 101 - 120 of 2,161
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Aug 2018, 4:25 pm by Jody Simon
The defense was that the mark had become generic by widespread use of the same or similar marks by other conventions. [read post]
9 Dec 2013, 12:27 am
Case T‑394/10, Elena Grebenshikova v OHIM, Volvo Trademark Holding AB intervening, is a fascinating decision of the General Court of the European Union (Third Chamber) on 5 December. [read post]
  The police subsequently interview the friend and take a statement that they wish to use in evidence. [read post]
18 Jul 2013, 3:05 am by Afro Leo
What is generic in one country may not be known or a well known trade mark in another in another (Polo in the UK v Polo in RSA; Kettle in the USA v Kettle in Europe; Xerox in the US and Xerox is RSA etc). [read post]
In Montres Breguet SA v Samsung Electronics, the owners of Swatch (and various other watch brand trade marks), objected to Samsung providing third-party watch faces on their Galaxy App Store featuring Swatch’s marks (the “Marks”). [read post]
3 May 2012, 5:31 pm by Dawinder "Dave" S. Sidhu
  I wish that my first post this month would be on the more positive end of the spectrum. [read post]
8 Dec 2020, 6:02 am by Nedim Malovic
The first and third questionsIn terms of assessing ‘genuine use’, the CJEU first noted that, according to Ansul BV v Ajax Brandbeveiliging BV (C–40/01), the fact that a mark is not used for goods newly available on the market but rather for goods that were sold in the past does not mean that its use is not genuine. [read post]
17 Nov 2014, 6:03 am by Wells Bennett
Before turning to the proceedings scheduled for this coming week, I wish to update observers interested in United States v. [read post]
20 Jun 2017, 3:18 pm by Marty Lederman
The constitutional analysis in the Supreme Court's decision yesterday in Matal v. [read post]
20 Dec 2020, 5:39 am by Neil Wilkof
The decision in Singapore by Principal Assistant Registrar of Trade Marks, Anne Loo (“PAR”), in Discovery Communications, LLC v A-Star-Education Discovery Camps Pte. [read post]
7 Dec 2018, 2:45 am by Peter Groves
Cadbury UK Ltd v The Comptroller General of Patents Designs And Trade Marks [2018] EWCA Civ 2715 (05 December 2018) is an unedifying case. [read post]
18 Nov 2014, 12:31 pm by Recommind
  Discovery solutions, he explained, that didn’t address those needs were missing the mark. [read post]
3 May 2018, 4:07 am by Edith Roberts
Briefly: At the Associated Press, Mark Sherman reports that the recurrent frenzy of speculation among court-watchers about the possible retirement of Justice Anthony Kennedy “reflects the darkest fears and fondest wishes of people who care about the court on both sides of the political spectrum. [read post]