Search for: "Marks v. Gas Service Company"
Results 101 - 120
of 298
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Oct 2017, 8:00 am
Gas City, Ltd., 187 USPQ 760 (TTAB 1975) (holding GAS CITY for gasoline and GASTOWN for gasoline likely to cause confusion); Watercare Corp. v. [read post]
6 Oct 2017, 11:39 pm
See Dulong v. [read post]
14 Sep 2017, 5:25 am
Spire, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Aug 2017, 5:37 pm
You are responsible for marking your own attendance. [read post]
20 Jun 2017, 11:33 am
Although the court did not decide whether trademarks are commercial speech subject to “relaxed” constitutional analysis under Central Hudson Gas & Electric Corp. v. [read post]
4 Jun 2017, 7:51 pm
These recommendations and challenges suggest that issues of corporate personality, of sovereign immunity, of asset partition, and of the mania for compartmentalization that marks certain approaches to global economic and financial regulation may well hobble the work of embedding human rights within the operation of states as owners and SOEs as public enterprises. [read post]
4 Apr 2017, 12:36 pm
Contact information for many companies is available here from the Forensic Resource Counsel of the Office of Indigent Defense Services. [read post]
6 Jan 2017, 8:02 am
(Midler v. [read post]
31 Dec 2016, 12:36 pm
Tweets are my own. (51) @VLJeker – V. [read post]
29 Nov 2016, 12:56 pm
The Syrian regime’s gains in Aleppo mark a significant turning point in the siege. [read post]
27 Nov 2016, 4:00 am
Baldwin allegedly suffered severe injuries to his back and neck when he fell while working on a Tennessee Oil and Gas Company platform. [read post]
23 Nov 2016, 9:16 am
PruittHealth, Inc., S16A0655 (Ga. [read post]
9 Nov 2016, 9:37 am
| Friday Fantasies| Meet the Trade Mark Judges (Part One)| HHJ Hacon amplifies the law on EU trade mark jurisdiction: AMS-Neve v Heritage Audio| Launch of IP Pro Bono scheme| Lundbeck v European Commission - a rotten decision or effective competition law enforcement? [read post]
2 Nov 2016, 3:44 pm
| Friday Fantasies| Meet the Trade Mark Judges (Part One)| HHJ Hacon amplifies the law on EU trade mark jurisdiction: AMS-Neve v Heritage Audio| Launch of IP Pro Bono scheme| Lundbeck v European Commission - a rotten decision or effective competition law enforcement? [read post]
25 Oct 2016, 10:45 pm
GuestKat Eibhlin Vardy discusses this case in which the Ninth Chamber of the General Court of the European Union dismissed the action for annulment of the Commission decision that ‘pay-for-delay’ agreements between Lundbeck and generic companies breach EU competition rules.PREVIOUSLY ON NEVER TOO LATENever Too Late 118 [week ending on Sunday 16 October] | Rome Court of First Instance rules that copyright exceptions for news reporting and criticism/review do not apply… [read post]
16 Jun 2016, 6:28 am
” City of Los Angeles v. [read post]
24 Feb 2016, 10:04 am
Ct. 1591 (2015), the Supreme Court held that the Natural Gas Act did not preempt state law antitrust claims against natural gas pipeline companies, even though the claims arose out of areas traditionally recognized as within the federal government’s regulatory scope. [read post]
11 Feb 2016, 7:34 am
The trial court ordered the parties to arbitration, appointed Judge Mark Davidson to arbitrate, and stayed the proceedings pending the outcome of the arbitration. [read post]
3 Feb 2016, 7:16 am
Northern Natural Gas Co. v. [read post]
13 Jan 2016, 12:59 pm
Almost 30 years ago the Ninth Circuit held this provision constitutional under the pre-Sorrellcommercial speech test established in Central Hudson Gas & Electric Corp. v. [read post]
