Search for: "Marks v. Goodding"
Results 101 - 120
of 12,104
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Mar 2024, 7:03 am
Hannah V. [read post]
6 Mar 2024, 4:39 pm
Bakshi v Hosseinzadeh (2017 ONCA 838) marks the seminal case which questions whether property transferred as Mahr, should be excluded pursuant to section 4(2) of the FLA or whether it should be included in the parties’ Net Family Property (NFP) for purposes of the equalization calculation. [read post]
6 Mar 2024, 4:39 pm
Bakshi v Hosseinzadeh (2017 ONCA 838) marks the seminal case which questions whether property transferred as Mahr, should be excluded pursuant to section 4(2) of the FLA or whether it should be included in the parties’ Net Family Property (NFP) for purposes of the equalization calculation. [read post]
6 Mar 2024, 7:44 am
The Tribunal held that there was both trade mark and copyright infringement.Anna Maria Stein outlined the findings of the UKIPO's report on “The impact of complicit social media influencers on male’s consumption of counterfeit goods in the UK. [read post]
6 Mar 2024, 4:04 am
A TTAB judge once said to me that one can predict the outcome of a Section 2(d) case about 95 percent of the time just by looking at the marks and the involved goods and/or services. [read post]
6 Mar 2024, 1:11 am
…the stone is not permitted under the Regulations and no good reason has been advanced for allowing an exception. [read post]
5 Mar 2024, 8:59 am
and by offering counterfeit goods in Pixels’ store: Canvasfish presents a plausible case that the goods Pixels sold bearing the DEYOUNG mark were counterfeits. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 5:56 pm
" (NSBA v. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 12:47 pm
Concluding that it4 TRUMP v. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 9:08 am
The plaintiff’s trade marks were used identically in the course of trade for identical goods, resulting in the finding of trade mark infringement. [read post]
2 Mar 2024, 1:04 pm
" Hughes, 506 Mich at 539 (quotation marks and citation omitted). [read post]
2 Mar 2024, 3:06 am
Critics also cite the Bush v. [read post]
1 Mar 2024, 4:17 pm
In Kejriwal v. [read post]
29 Feb 2024, 3:23 pm
Others have looked at the holding itself, but I thought it would be a good opportunity to look at the issue of accessible kiosks generally to see how this case fits with earlier decisions and ask whether it marks a significant change in the law. [read post]
29 Feb 2024, 3:53 am
Marks v. [read post]
28 Feb 2024, 3:29 am
Monster Energy Company v. [read post]
24 Feb 2024, 1:10 pm
We think of TMs as informational vessels that allow consumers to make decisions for themselves based on what they’ve learned either personally or through other means about the goods bearing the mark. [read post]
23 Feb 2024, 1:43 pm
Citing both Dogan/Lemley and Dinwoodie/Janis is a good example: those articles don’t say the same thing. [read post]
23 Feb 2024, 5:38 am
On Wednesday, the Supreme Court heard oral arguments on a set of stay applications, consolidated under the caption Ohio v. [read post]
23 Feb 2024, 4:06 am
Oregon Grain Growers Brand Distillery Inc. v. [read post]
