Search for: "Marks v. Marks"
Results 101 - 120
of 34,288
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Mar 2007, 9:00 pm
"See Knight Textile Corp. v. [read post]
20 Mar 2013, 6:59 am
Cabell v. [read post]
22 Apr 2019, 12:08 pm
The post A trademark case with colorful language: Amy Howe and Mark Walsh talk through <em>Iancu v. [read post]
2 Jan 2010, 9:16 pm
The Forest Group, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Mar 2017, 1:59 am
For instance, a Single Judge of the Delhi High Court in Bloomberg Finance LP v. [read post]
13 Jul 2009, 9:32 am
The Forest Group v. [read post]
28 Mar 2022, 2:17 am
For the latter, Viceroy v Syrowatka will be used as an illustrative example. [read post]
28 Mar 2022, 2:17 am
For the latter, Viceroy v Syrowatka will be used as an illustrative example. [read post]
23 May 2007, 10:37 am
Raytheon Company v. [read post]
8 Jul 2010, 6:12 am
Inc. v. [read post]
7 Apr 2014, 5:44 am
Jane Lambert In Cosmetic Warriors Ltd and Another v amazon.co.uk Ltd and Another [2014] EWHC 181 Mr John Baldwin QC, sitting as a judge of the High Court, had to decide whether causing advertising to appear on an an Internet user's screen for products that competed with those of the claimants whenever the user entered the claimants' trade mark into a search box amounted to an [read post]
25 Jan 2011, 7:03 am
" Baker v. [read post]
3 Apr 2019, 9:55 am
Popular consensus suggests that Mr Gleissner does this with commercial gain in mind [and not for the sheer, heady love of trade mark procedure].Readers might remember Mr Gleissner from such previous trade mark actions as Sherlock Systems CV v Apple Inc (concerning 68 applications to revoke trade marks owned by Apple for non-use) and CKL Holdings Limited v Paper Stacked Limited (the "Alexander" case), which involved two of… [read post]
28 Nov 2017, 2:57 am
The well-known High Court judge, who took the audience carefully through various key cases on the topic (such as the CJEU Lindt case (C-529/07) and the Redbull v Sun Mark case ([2012] EWHC 1929 (Ch)), focussed specifically on the link between intention to use and the requirement for the EUTM holder not to register the trade mark in ‘bad faith. [read post]
15 Mar 2011, 1:18 pm
See Roche Diagnostics Corp. v. [read post]
18 Oct 2017, 10:10 am
While the square shape and the v-shaped groves have a technical effect, the bevelled edges and corners did not achieve a technical effect, but a "sensory effect when consumed" ("eine sensorische Wirkung beim Verbrauch"). [read post]
21 Jun 2012, 8:10 am
June 21, 2012: This week marks the thirteenth anniversary of the Supreme Court’s decision in Olmstead v. [read post]
2 Mar 2010, 7:58 am
Yesterday, two plaintiffs (Patent Compliance Group and Bentley Hollander) who have already filed multiple false marking lawsuits since the Federal Circuit's Forest Group Inc. v. [read post]
19 Jun 2023, 4:50 am
However, in ICollege (Pty) Ltd v Xpertease Skills Development and Mentoring CC and Another decided in May, it appears that the Supreme Court of Appeal of South Africa followed a different line of reasoning.BackgroundThis was an appeal against the decision of the High Court in Pretoria which dismissed the appellant’s application for an injunction restraining the first respondent from infringing the appellant’s rights acquired through the registration of its trade marks;… [read post]
11 Mar 2015, 2:54 am
This case is Kelly-Brown v Winfrey, No. 11 cv 7875 (S.D.N.Y. [read post]
