Search for: "Marks v. USA" Results 101 - 120 of 1,895
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
The federal district court in Alexandria did not err in finding that a German company’s mark VAGISAN used on feminine care products was likely to cause confusion with Combe, Inc. [read post]
3 Aug 2012, 12:57 am by war
It seems Mr Brailsford may well have coined the mark and used it in the USA. [read post]
2 Jan 2018, 4:19 am
January 11, 2018 - 11 AM: Standard Tools and Equipment Co. v. [read post]
9 Aug 2016, 1:00 am by Mark Engstrom
The Implications and Consequences of United Kingdom Exit from the EU by Patrick J Birkinshaw, Andrea Biondi (eds,)€ 125 The post USA: IPCom GmbH & Co. v. [read post]
17 Sep 2016, 4:01 am by Mark Engstrom
The Implications and Consequences of United Kingdom Exit from the EU by Patrick J Birkinshaw, Andrea Biondi (eds,)€ 125 The post USA: VocalTag Ltd. v. [read post]
30 Apr 2016, 6:18 pm by Farrah Nagrampa
Supreme Court case, Miranda v. [read post]
2 Aug 2021, 8:17 am by Linda O'Brien (CCH)
Thus, the judgment on the trademark infringement and false advertising claims were reversed and the case remanded (Select Comfort Corp. v. [read post]
19 Jan 2021, 8:08 am by Kevin M. Finson
Both marks were used for apparel and related retail services (North 61 LLC v. [read post]