Search for: "Martinez v. California"
Results 101 - 120
of 506
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 May 2018, 3:58 pm
On Monday, April 30, 2018, the California Supreme Court issued a landmark decision in the matter of Dynamex Operations West, Inc. v. [read post]
7 May 2018, 3:58 pm
On Monday, April 30, 2018, the California Supreme Court issued a landmark decision in the matter of Dynamex Operations West, Inc. v. [read post]
5 May 2018, 5:31 pm
In 2010, in Martinez v. [read post]
2 May 2018, 10:09 am
Their motion for class certification argued that, under Martinez v. [read post]
2 May 2018, 6:57 am
Borello & Sons, Inc. v. [read post]
1 May 2018, 2:19 pm
In 2008, the California Supreme Court issued its decision in Martinez v. [read post]
1 May 2018, 2:19 pm
In 2008, the California Supreme Court issued its decision in Martinez v. [read post]
1 May 2018, 1:02 pm
On Monday, April 30, 2018, the California Supreme Court issued a landmark decision in the matter of Dynamex Operations West, Inc. v. [read post]
1 May 2018, 10:44 am
At issue in Dynamex was the scope of Martinez v. [read post]
16 Apr 2018, 9:56 am
For example, Holland America Line requires Seattle, Washington and Princess Cruises requires California. [read post]
27 Mar 2018, 11:49 am
In determining that 7-Eleven properly classified the franchisees as independent contractors, the court applied the three-prong test outlined by the California Supreme Court in Martinez v. [read post]
27 Mar 2018, 7:29 am
Finding the alleged facts “wholly insufficient” to create an employment relationship under the Martinez v. [read post]
23 Mar 2018, 1:56 pm
(See Martinez v. [read post]
14 Feb 2018, 7:38 am
An even gloomier portent for the government is the Supreme Court’s 2016 decision in Molina-Martinez v. [read post]
12 Feb 2018, 5:00 am
Dean v. [read post]
7 Feb 2018, 10:52 pm
” The Issue In agreeing to review the case, the California Supreme Court defined the issue on appeal as whether, in a misclassification case, a class may be certified based on the expansive definition of employee as outlined in the California Wage Order language construed in Martinez v. [read post]
7 Feb 2018, 12:17 pm
Seyfarth Synopsis: The California Supreme Court heard oral arguments yesterday morning in Dynamex Operations v. [read post]
6 Feb 2018, 10:00 am
Superior Court (Martinez) (1990) 224 Cal.App.3d 1446, 1458; Williamson v. [read post]
15 Dec 2017, 10:31 pm
” Martinez v. [read post]
13 Dec 2017, 12:07 pm
In other cases, such as Christian Legal Society v. [read post]
