Search for: "Martinez v. Department of Justice"
Results 101 - 120
of 201
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Jan 2012, 8:06 am
Just last month, the Supreme Court applied administrative law principles to reverse a decision of the Department of Justice’s Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA). [read post]
12 Oct 2010, 9:41 am
http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/opinions/2010/09/27/09-30108.pdf Martinez v. [read post]
6 Aug 2022, 7:25 am
Brown v. [read post]
18 Jan 2024, 3:45 am
The concept made sense back in 1984, when the Supreme Court held in Chevron v. [read post]
19 Mar 2010, 7:17 am
The Department of Justice is considering an appeal to the Supreme Court after the 9th Circuit handed down a ruling yesterday in al-Kidd v. [read post]
2 Mar 2012, 7:58 am
North Carolina, 11-6624, appears to be a straightforward hold for Martinez v. [read post]
11 Jul 2014, 11:01 am
Martinez, 690 F.3d 1083 (U.S. [read post]
19 Jun 2018, 11:57 am
” According to the Justice Department, the statute underlying sentencing modifications imposes on the court “no duty” to provide an “on-the-record explanation’” of its reasons. [read post]
7 Jul 2015, 5:20 am
Recently, the Justice Department exposed major problems with microscopic hair testing in criminal cases. [read post]
7 Jan 2022, 10:26 am
Instead, the Department of Justice argues that no hearings are required here because immigrants get paper “file reviews,” done solely by ICE — the jailer. [read post]
21 Nov 2010, 5:10 pm
New Jersey and Ring v. [read post]
24 Nov 2014, 3:03 pm
HERNANDEZ, PEDRO JOSE MARTINEZ, WILLIAMS ARIELLO GALANTINO, JOSE DE LA CRUZ CARDENAS, on their own behalf and others similarly situated, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. [read post]
9 Aug 2022, 6:04 am
California Court Clarifies Position on Websites and the ADA In a recent case, Martinez v. [read post]
5 Sep 2008, 3:32 pm
Department of Justice Manual you can find here. [read post]
1 Jul 2022, 4:00 am
Several former senior Justice Department officials testified about a bizarre effort by Clark to volunteer himself and the department as advocates for Trump’s bogus claims of massive voter fraud during the election. [read post]
2 Jul 2010, 8:24 am
Institutional Division of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice and Miguel Martinez v. [read post]
27 Aug 2007, 3:00 am
Martinez
• People v. [read post]
13 Feb 2018, 10:56 am
Martinez and United States v. [read post]
25 Oct 2010, 9:15 am
This edition of “Petitions to watch” features cases up for consideration at the Justices’ October 29 conference. [read post]
9 May 2011, 6:16 am
Government may afford religious institutions exemptions from certain laws in order to protect religious freedom, but is not constitutionally required to, according to the landmark case of Employment Division, Department of Human Resources of Oregon v. [read post]
