Search for: "Maryland v. Louisiana"
Results 101 - 120
of 454
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Apr 2020, 8:10 am
See U.S. v. [read post]
26 Feb 2020, 12:12 pm
Maryland’s Noncompete and Conflict of Interest Clauses Act took effect on October 1, 2019. [read post]
23 Feb 2020, 4:17 am
Act. 6993, Delaware Chancery Court (Mar. 30, 2012) at 12; Brief of Amici Curiae Attorneys General for the Commonwealths of Kentucky, Massachusetts, and Pennsylvania, the States of Arizona, Alabama, Alaska, Arkansas, Colorado, Connecticut, Florida, Georgia, Idaho, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Louisiana, Maine, Maryland, Michigan, Minnesota, Missouri, Montana, Nevada, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New York, North Dakota, Oklahoma, Oregon, Rhode Island, South Carolina, South Dakota,… [read post]
9 Feb 2020, 4:00 am
See Camp v. [read post]
6 Jan 2020, 5:45 am
Supreme Court’s Wayfair v. [read post]
20 Dec 2019, 8:49 am
Benisek, the challenge to a single federal congressional district in Maryland. [read post]
20 Dec 2019, 2:00 am
Supreme Court’s South Dakota v. [read post]
19 Dec 2019, 2:00 am
Kansas Rolling FAGI FTI Kentucky 12/31/18 FAGI FTI Louisiana Rolling FAGI Federal gross receipts (Line 1a) Maine 12/31/18 FAGI FTI Maryland Rolling FAGI FTI Massachusetts Rolling (CIT); 1/1/05 (PIT) State calculation Federal gross income Michigan Rolling FAGI FTI Minnesota 12/31/18 FAGI FTI Mississippi Selective State calculation FTI before NOLs and special deds. [read post]
12 Dec 2019, 5:45 am
Key Findings Following the 2018 South Dakota v. [read post]
27 Nov 2019, 5:45 am
In light of states’ differing responses to the Wayfair v. [read post]
21 Nov 2019, 6:03 am
of Texas at Austin 1.18 $106,598 $90,100 V&erbilt Univ. 1.19 $129,030 $108,800 Univ. of Arkansas 1.19 $61,500 $51,700 Mitchell Hamline Sch. of Law 1.21 $64,429 $53,200 Univ. of California-Los Angeles 1.26 $121,453 $96,600 Univ. of North Dakota 1.26 $61,500 $48,800 Univ. of Kansas 1.27 $66,415 $52,100 Univ. of Kentucky 1.28 $69,860 $54,400 Univ. of Mississippi 1.32 $64,300 $48,700 The Univ. [read post]
16 Oct 2019, 1:28 pm
In 2012, in Miller v. [read post]
11 Oct 2019, 3:00 am
The 2010 SpeechNow v. [read post]
6 Aug 2019, 5:45 am
For instance, Maryland permits local governments to provide a credit for expanding manufacturing facilities.[6] Similarly, Idaho allows counties to exempt TPP that is part of an investment of at least $500,000 in a new manufacturing plant for up to five years.[7] Seven states (Delaware, Hawaii, Illinois, Iowa, New York, Ohio, and Pennsylvania) exempt all TPP from taxation, while another five states (Minnesota, New Hampshire, New Jersey, North Dakota, and South Dakota)… [read post]
14 Jun 2019, 4:30 am
Beard v. [read post]
7 Jun 2019, 10:35 am
Thomas v. [read post]
1 Jun 2019, 4:00 am
See Maryland v. [read post]
28 May 2019, 8:13 am
In Himsel v. [read post]
13 May 2019, 4:06 am
Gee, a pending cert petition challenging a Louisiana law that would require abortion providers to have admitting privileges at nearby hospitals,] … could be first in a series of incremental rulings on a path that, in the end, would determine the fate [of] Roe v. [read post]
27 Mar 2019, 4:12 am
Benisek, in which Republican voters are challenging a single Maryland congressional district. [read post]
