Search for: "Matter of Apple" Results 101 - 120 of 7,536
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Sep 2012, 11:15 am by Florian Mueller
While Samsung's motion for dissolution will be heard on September 20, Apple will have to wait until (at least) December before any new injunction issues.Judge Koh doesn't allow Apple to ask for reconsideration of those schedules simply because "no change in facts or the law has changed the Court's opinion" on this matter since Apple had the opportunity to oppose Samsung's request for an expedited schedule for its dissolution request. [read post]
8 Mar 2012, 6:03 am by Steven
Reuters – “The Justice Department has warned Apple and five of the biggest U.S. publishers that it plans to sue them, accusing them of colluding to raise the prices of electronic books, the Wall Street Journal said, citing people familiar with the matter. [read post]
31 Jan 2013, 11:36 am by Florian Mueller
Today the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit denied, without stating any particular reasons, Apple's petition for a rehearing of its mid-October opinion on the Galaxy Nexus preliminary injunction matter. [read post]
24 Dec 2015, 10:27 am by Florian Mueller
Again, I think it should have backtracked because no one in this industry, including Apple, would want invalid patents to be enforceable in any way, but a withdrawal is something unrealistic to hope or ask for at this stage.If you'd like to be updated on the smartphone patent disputes and other intellectual property matters I cover, please subscribe to my RSS feed (in the right-hand column) and/or follow me on Twitter @FOSSpatents and Google+.Follow @FOSSpatents Share with… [read post]
9 Jan 2013, 2:35 pm by Florian Mueller
Samsung presented products that it claimed did not infringe Apple's patents even if the ITC agreed with Apple's infringement arguments (which Samsung also disputed and still disputes). [read post]
18 Jan 2016, 7:46 pm by Florian Mueller
But in the practical context of the Apple-Samsung patent dispute, this injunction doesn't matter. [read post]
21 Nov 2013, 12:05 am by Florian Mueller
Later that day Judge Koh discussed this matter with counsel and told Apple to respond within a day. [read post]
26 Mar 2013, 1:09 pm by Florian Mueller
So I would agree with Apple that what Judge Koh considered to be an aggressive notice date doesn't matter with respect to the Galaxy S II AT&T. [read post]
28 Jul 2014, 11:33 am by Florian Mueller
A proposed order is attached.If you'd like to be updated on the smartphone patent disputes and other intellectual property matters I cover, please subscribe to my RSS feed (in the right-hand column) and/or follow me on Twitter @FOSSpatents and Google+.Follow @FOSSpatents Share with other professionals via LinkedIn: Share| [read post]
8 Oct 2014, 1:34 am by Florian Mueller
Of all the possibilities the one that seems relatively most likely is that the postjudgment royalties matter will be stayed pending an appeal of a final ruling on the merits.A possible explanation for Apple's try-everything-at-once approach could be that Apple and Samsung may be in final settlement negotiations to put the U.S. part of the dispute to rest as well, and Apple may just want to build as much pressure as it can at this stage, given that its… [read post]
26 Feb 2016, 12:17 pm by Alexander J. Davie
 I will, however, give my observations and thoughts on the matter. [read post]
26 Feb 2016, 12:17 pm by Alexander J. Davie
 I will, however, give my observations and thoughts on the matter. [read post]
2 Feb 2022, 9:01 pm by News Desk
In lab testing, chlorine at 25 ppm had limited efficacy against Listeria in high-organic matter dump water. [read post]
20 Dec 2012, 12:38 am by Florian Mueller
Since there is no stipulation in place between the parties concerning mutual non-opposition, Apple's filing discusses, as a matter of precaution, reasons for which the court might find that Samsung has failed to show good cause for its latest amendments. [read post]
19 Feb 2016, 4:55 pm by Joseph Bonneau
Assuming Apple developed a working version, it would simply be a matter of changing which phone ID the software was bound to and re-signing it. [read post]
15 Feb 2017, 8:58 pm by Patent Docs
While the determination of whether a claim is obvious is ostensibly an objective matter, reasonable minds can differ. [read post]
17 Feb 2022, 8:15 am by Jonathan Bailey
Let me know via Twitter @plagiarismtoday. 1: Apple Defeats Copyright Lawsuit Over Racially Diverse Emoji First off today, Blake Brittain at Reuters reports that Apple has emerged victorious in a lawsuit filed against them over racially diverse Emoji that were included in various Apple products. [read post]
30 Jun 2013, 8:35 pm by Evan Brown (@internetcases)
The court noted that as a threshold matter, it was plaintiff’s burden to establish a causal connection to some portion of profits before Apple would have to carry the burden of apportioning profits that were not the result of infringement. [read post]
14 Nov 2013, 12:33 am by Florian Mueller
That's more than Samsung's lawyers (who also do a lot of work for Google against Apple and others, but did not bring the motion for an exception in the Southern District of California) can say.If you'd like to be updated on the smartphone patent disputes and other intellectual property matters I cover, please subscribe to my RSS feed (in the right-hand column) and/or follow me on Twitter @FOSSpatents and Google+.Follow @FOSSpatents Share with other professionals via LinkedIn:… [read post]