Search for: "Matter of Applications for Water Rights"
Results 101 - 120
of 2,217
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Aug 2022, 5:48 pm
Department of Water Resources (2022) ___ Cal.5th ___, Case No. [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 2:21 am
Mexican states have the authority to establish urban development laws applicable within their territorial limits which establish the types of land use permitted, and the rules for approval of specific land uses, among other matters. [read post]
31 Jan 2013, 9:30 pm
Para 15(iii) of Annexure D to the Treaty gives the right to India to judge whether it is necessary to divert the waters of Kishanganga. [read post]
18 Mar 2014, 2:34 pm
Scary, right? [read post]
15 Jun 2015, 11:06 am
The Court of Appeal’s opinion contains interesting discussions of basic California water rights principles, the Gold Rush’s aftermath, and § 1602’s origins and early interpretations, as well as extensive discussion of the interpretive rules applicable to statutory ambiguity and the proper use of legislative history. [read post]
14 Apr 2014, 8:09 am
Existing international human rights law, and international humanitarian law governing the conduct of armed conflict, remain applicable. [read post]
11 Mar 2022, 9:19 am
The “Baby and Adult Hygiene Product Association” (yup, the industry group representing the big commercial manufacturers of menstrual products) is pushing for watered down language. [read post]
14 Feb 2014, 10:29 am
In Matter of Exeter Building Corp. v. [read post]
24 Mar 2014, 6:00 am
The owner does have the right to appeal and seek review of the order. [read post]
27 Dec 2021, 8:15 am
If you’re selling your personality rights, make sure you understand the implications!!! [read post]
11 Jan 2023, 7:21 am
In that case, even though the right of entry is no longer applicable, any minerals extracted by the owner would still belong to the party (if any) who held the mineral reservations. [read post]
11 Jan 2023, 7:21 am
In that case, even though the right of entry is no longer applicable, any minerals extracted by the owner would still belong to the party (if any) who held the mineral reservations. [read post]
11 Jan 2023, 7:21 am
In that case, even though the right of entry is no longer applicable, any minerals extracted by the owner would still belong to the party (if any) who held the mineral reservations. [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 4:22 am
Here is the application, in PDF and text: NOTICE OF APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO APPEAL (ELLEN SMITH, APPLICANT) (Pursuant to Section 40 of the Supreme Court Act and Rule 25 of the Rules of the Supreme Court of Canada) APPLICANT (Respondent) RESPONDENT (Appellant) TAKE NOTICE that Ellen Smith hereby applies for leave to appeal to the Court, pursuant to sections 40 and 43 of the Supreme Court Act, R.S.C. 1985, c. [read post]
16 Mar 2021, 9:33 pm
The Respondent is also unlawfully interfering with the Applicant's exclusive rights in its PACIFIC trade marks and PACIFIC get-ups. [read post]
28 Sep 2007, 9:47 am
We think of communications as a utility, like electricity or water, that is regulated by the government. [read post]
17 May 2013, 5:01 am
This video was also available on YouTube, without the applicant’s consent. [read post]
21 Dec 2022, 11:14 am
Premium Waters, Inc. [read post]
18 Aug 2011, 4:52 am
All Rights Reserved.. [read post]
11 May 2010, 4:53 am
Under cross-examination Marcon made clear that he did not believe that he should have the right to claim CORONA in association with beer, but believed that no one would be confused as to the source of CORONA-branded water, juice or even wine products he might offer. [read post]
