Search for: "Matter of Barrett"
Results 101 - 120
of 1,347
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Feb 2008, 11:33 pm
I believe the conventional view is mistaken as a matter of the original public meaning of the Constitution. [read post]
25 Jul 2015, 9:34 am
Pollard's release in a matter of weeks. [read post]
22 Jan 2007, 3:49 am
Seth Barrett Tillman has posted Senate Termination of Presidential Recess Appointments (Northwestern University Law Review Colloquy, Vol. 2, January 2007) on SSRN. [read post]
6 Feb 2021, 7:31 am
It is common for a justice's first majority opinion to involve a relatively minor matter. [read post]
17 Oct 2008, 6:17 pm
University of Notre Dame Professor Law Amy Barrett discusses the case. [read post]
16 Nov 2010, 10:00 pm
This post was written by LegalBizDev Principal Steve Barrett. [read post]
26 Oct 2020, 7:39 pm
Finally, a small technical matter. [read post]
27 Dec 2011, 6:02 am
Individuals do not matter, #AntiSec will move on. [read post]
13 Dec 2021, 5:00 am
For a time, Section 3's meaning was a matter of substantial debate. [read post]
11 Feb 2015, 6:54 am
Questions considered by the Supreme Court this year have included: whether depriving a dual-national of British citizenship for terrorist offences resulted in him becoming stateless, in contravention of international law (Secretary for State of the Home Department v B2 (Case Preview); whether the Prince of Wales’ letters to government ministers should be disclosed to the media (R (Evans) v Her Majesty’s Attorney-General (Case Preview); and whether publication of CCTV images of a minor… [read post]
11 Sep 2023, 3:00 pm
., Justice Barrett), this just does not seem correct. [read post]
16 Jul 2017, 3:56 am
If the stress is felt by the listener, no matter what the foundation for the delusion, what difference does it make that the speech meets with some third person’s, say Lisa Barrett’s, approval? [read post]
15 Oct 2020, 5:58 am
" The extent to which judges can and should keep personal moral convictions out of the law is of course a matter of debate. [read post]
3 Nov 2016, 6:10 am
By Devlin Barrett and Christopher M. [read post]
16 Jan 2018, 3:39 pm
Somewhat unusually, the opinion cites two of our appeals from the Barrett cases, that I argued before the Court of Appeals.I think the panel got it wrong in Spear, and the legislative history from the Boyd-Graves Conference is instructive. [read post]
2 Nov 2020, 9:48 am
Although Justice Amy Coney Barrett joined the court last week, she did not participate in the conference; a statement from a Supreme Court spokeswoman indicated that Barrett sat out the conference to give her more time to prepare for oral arguments. [read post]
17 Nov 2019, 10:49 am
[Seth Barrett Tillman and I suggest that the answer is yes.] [read post]
1 Oct 2020, 3:27 am
If you really believe it matters, then fight the good fight until the battle is lost. [read post]
29 Oct 2020, 12:28 pm
Should it matter? [read post]
9 Jan 2024, 11:59 am
As a threshold matter, Respondents have some explaining to do. [read post]
