Search for: "Matter of Beers v Beers" Results 101 - 120 of 614
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Mar 2014, 2:00 pm by Kenneth J. Vanko
District Court Judge - Northern District of Illinois on March 5, 2014, discussing holding of Fifield v. [read post]
6 Apr 2009, 11:52 am
U.S. 4th Circuit Court of Appeals, April 02, 2009 Andrew v. [read post]
17 Jul 2015, 8:07 pm by Stephen Bilkis
A New York Family Lawyer said that on July 1, 2005, after spending several hours in a bar in Manhattan, at which he consumed at least six beers, the defendant attended a friend's party in Merrick in Nassau County. [read post]
13 May 2015, 6:00 am by Martha Engel
  The Sixth Circuit ruled that the liquor commission had violated Flying Dog’s First Amendment rights and that the liquor commission should have been on notice that “banning a beer label for vulgarity violates the First Amendment” based on Bad Frog Brewery, Inc. v. [read post]
7 Dec 2023, 7:39 am
Jackson contended that CHATEAU LA GORDONNE is a house mark and VÉRITÉ DU TERROIR is "its own unitary composite product name," and therefore the presence of the CHATEAU LA GORDONNE portion does not avoid confusion as a matter of law because both marks contain the term VÉRITÉ. [read post]
5 Feb 2014, 3:26 pm
No, just a glass-- but beer's best tasted in glass that's waisted" (here), soon-to-be-guest-Kat Darren Meale provided us with a commentary on the design law issues arising from Utopia Tableware v BBP Marketing Ltd [2013] EWHC 3483, a decision of Mr Recorder Douglas Campbell sitting as an Enterprise Judge in the Intellectual Property Enterprise Court (IPEC) for England and Wales. [read post]
15 Jul 2013, 2:53 pm by Jon Sands
Prysock, 453 U.S. 355 (1981), and it didn't matter that the English warnings were OK.The decision is here:http://cdn.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/opinions/2013/07/15/12-30074.pdfUnited States v. [read post]
1 Nov 2010, 12:17 pm by John Elwood
United States, 10–11311, granted 9/28); Beer v. [read post]
13 Apr 2018, 4:31 pm by INFORRM
The second day of the trial in the case of Sir Cliff Richard v BBC took place yesterday before Mr Justice Mann. [read post]
3 Mar 2013, 8:42 pm by Madhulika Vishwanathan
 Moving on further, Aparajita highlighted the Bombay High court’s recent decision on Trademark infringement of SABMiller India Ltd. v/s Som. [read post]