Search for: "Matter of Booker"
Results 101 - 120
of 554
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Nov 2013, 4:00 am
The Senate's newest addition, New Jersey's Cory Booker (D), as well as his fellow statesman, Robert Mendendez (D), we are also among the yes votes. [read post]
12 Jan 2020, 4:58 am
Does it matter? [read post]
7 Sep 2018, 5:43 am
Also during the afternoon session, Booker pressed [WP report] Kavanaugh on whether he would recuse himself from any matter the high court might hear regarding President Trump and the Russian investigation. [read post]
29 Mar 2013, 4:09 pm
You cannot snatch forcibly remove a baby from the care of his parents in this country without a court order, except in very limited circumstances and then only for a matter of hours in case of emergency. [read post]
2 Mar 2018, 3:33 am
But that was before Booker, holding the Sentencing Guidelines advisory. [read post]
22 Aug 2006, 1:29 pm
Grier will consider en banc appropriate burdens of proof in post-Booker federal sentencing. [read post]
7 Jun 2020, 11:08 am
Please contact each individual workers’ compensation court if you have questions about a scheduled hearing, motion, conference, or other matter by email, fax, or telephone. [read post]
29 May 2011, 1:30 pm
The agreement, however, allowed the government to argue for a sentence of up to 151 months under Booker, and/or argue for an upward departure in Ellis’s criminal history. [read post]
4 Mar 2020, 12:41 pm
Last week, Senators Elizabeth Warren, Kamala Harris and Cory Booker sent a letter to the U.S. [read post]
25 Mar 2011, 7:55 am
Booker invalidated the mandatory federal sentencing guidelines and changed the federal sentencing dynamic forever. [read post]
5 Jul 2012, 5:55 pm
Booker v Cincinnati Bengals, Case No. [read post]
21 Feb 2017, 8:29 am
Booker recast the federal sentencing guidelines as “effectively advisory. [read post]
30 Mar 2005, 5:00 am
Neither does the most recent Booker plain error case from the First Circuit, United States v. [read post]
11 Oct 2007, 1:20 pm
The three rules are: (1) Money matters; (2) Beware the corporate chieftain; and (3) Elected officials violating the public trust should not receive credit for good works. [read post]
7 Feb 2011, 5:22 am
“Correlation is not causation,” Booker said. [read post]
12 Dec 2007, 10:22 pm
But from a perspective that exhibits concern for equal justice under law, framed either as a constitutional or policy matter, these cases raise and aggravate the same anxieties I had immediately after Booker because now the SCT (7 of them no less) are saying, go ahead, district court, check out the guidelines, but in the end do what you want and we'll back you up so long as you make sure you can deftly invoke some plausible sentencing purposes language somewhere in your… [read post]
16 Mar 2010, 6:48 am
McCollum, see Z’s post here and prior NYT editorial here, is a must read for anyone representing Vets outside of courts-martial (and in the military justice system, for that matter). [read post]
6 Nov 2006, 4:54 am
I think the prospect of a "topless" guidelines Booker fix is diminished if Democrats gain control of either or both houses of Congress. [read post]
14 Aug 2006, 2:22 pm
It didn't seem to matter to the Court when the district court in U.S. v. [read post]
14 Jul 2014, 10:02 am
Prior to sentencing, the government raised concern about Cruz’s competency and moved for a determination on the matter. [read post]
