Search for: "Matter of Brady"
Results 101 - 120
of 1,240
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Sep 2009, 1:10 pm
"Once they thought they could convict someone, innocence didn't matter. [read post]
18 Feb 2015, 10:19 am
They wanted copies of the Brady Lists as well as copies of letters written by prosecutors internally which name a particular police officer as being so notoriously untrustworthy that they cannot be used in prosecution matters. [read post]
31 Mar 2010, 1:10 pm
The New York Court of Appeals remitted the matter to the trial court for a hearing on Brady's financial ability to share the costs of arbitration. [read post]
19 Jul 2014, 2:55 pm
On March 2, 2011, defense counsel was actually engaged on another matter. [read post]
29 Jul 2010, 6:47 am
Brady v. [read post]
14 Jun 2010, 10:15 am
Quarles & Brady recently welcomed attorney William ("Bill") Hamilton, a leading expert in the e-discovery field, into its ranks. [read post]
5 Aug 2013, 11:25 am
I’m not sure about this analysis as a matter of modern American tort law, but it might well be consistent with Illinois law, and in any event I think this would be the right result under 47 U.S.C. [read post]
25 Mar 2022, 4:43 pm
., decided yesterday by Judge Holly Brady (N.D. [read post]
17 Oct 2022, 10:04 am
This is referred to as the Brady Rule and is a result of Brady v. [read post]
27 Oct 2017, 4:53 am
That’s a matter of one’s personal sensibilities, and some might suggest that the facts speak for themselves. [read post]
29 Jan 2020, 7:08 am
Brady DA 19-0036 2020 MT 21N Civil – Declaratory Judgment Matter of M.Q. [read post]
16 Oct 2019, 7:38 am
Since civil cases can influence criminal ones, it’s most likely that the civil case will remain on hold until the criminal matters are resolved one way or another. [read post]
FAILURE TO RECOGNIZE DUTY TO DISCLOSE FAVORABLE EVIDENCE WITHOUT REGARD TO MATERIALITY HAUNTS COURTS
17 Mar 2013, 6:03 am
Supreme Court in a 1963 landmark decision, Brady v. [read post]
9 May 2018, 3:25 pm
To briefly recap, the puzzle I’m exploring has to do with the unusual way in which courts conceptualize prejudice in two of criminal procedure’s most important doctrinal areas: (1) the Brady rule, which requires prosecutors to disclose (some) exculpatory evidence to the defense as a matter of Due Process, and (2) the Sixth Amendment right to effective assistance of counsel. [read post]
FAILURE TO RECOGNIZE DUTY TO DISCLOSE FAVORABLE EVIDENCE WITHOUT REGARD TO MATERIALITY HAUNTS COURTS
17 Mar 2013, 6:03 am
Supreme Court in a 1963 landmark decision, Brady v. [read post]
FAILURE TO RECOGNIZE DUTY TO DISCLOSE FAVORABLE EVIDENCE WITHOUT REGARD TO MATERIALITY HAUNTS COURTS
17 Mar 2013, 6:03 am
Supreme Court in a 1963 landmark decision, Brady v. [read post]
6 Sep 2012, 4:57 am
" Is there not a policy in the department to turn over Brady material to prosecutors? [read post]
23 Jul 2010, 10:24 am
Matter of Lorrainer C. [read post]
7 Apr 2010, 7:30 am
On March 23, 2010, Northern District Judge, Susan Illston, granted plaintiff’s motion to certify plaintiff’s misclassification claims in Brady v. [read post]
11 Jul 2016, 5:36 am
For many police officers, this is a matter of due process. [read post]
