Search for: "Matter of Doe v Kelly" Results 101 - 120 of 638
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Aug 2013, 5:18 am by Giles Peaker
As a matter of law it was impossible for the Council to revoke the notice to quit. [read post]
14 Aug 2013, 5:18 am by Giles Peaker
As a matter of law it was impossible for the Council to revoke the notice to quit. [read post]
11 Mar 2020, 8:26 pm by Public Employment Law Press
[A] penalty must be upheld unless it is so disproportionate to the offense as to be shocking to one's sense of fairness'" (Matter of County of Erie v New York State Div. of Human Rights, 121 AD3d 1564, 1566 [4th Dept 2014], quoting Matter of Kelly v Safir, 96 NY2d 32, 38 [2001]; see also Matter of New York State Div. of Human Rights v International Fin. [read post]
19 Nov 2010, 1:08 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Corp., 84 AD2d 789 [1981]; Matter of Rosenberg v Brooklyn Union Gas Co., 80 AD2d 834 [1981]; Matter of Urban v Hooker Chems. [read post]
1 Oct 2009, 6:49 am by hjmarcus
SRO Paul Kelly has uniformly sided with the districts on these cases. [read post]
26 Oct 2010, 4:02 am
Seltzer commenced an CPLR Article 78* proceeding in an effort to obtain a court order annulling the determination terminating his employment as a City of Rochester Municipal Parking Coordinator following a disciplinary hearing held pursuant to Civil Service Law §75.The Appellate Division dismissed his appeal, commenting that the disciplinary determination was supported by “substantial evidence, i.e., ‘such relevant proof as a reasonable mind may accept as adequate to support a… [read post]
17 Feb 2009, 4:10 am
Its only leeway available to the administrative tribunal is in recommending or imposing a penalty.The decision in Kelly [Kelly v Levin, 440 NYS2d 424] illustrates this point. [read post]