Search for: "Matter of Hammer v Hammer" Results 101 - 120 of 443
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Dec 2017, 4:20 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
It is incumbent upon the plaintiff to present expert testimony to support allegations of malpractice (see 530 E. 89 Corp. v Unger, 43 NY2d 776, 777; McDermott v Manhattan Eye, Ear & Throat Hosp., 15 NY2d 20, 24), except where the alleged act of malpractice falls within the competence of a lay jury to evaluate (see 530 E. 89 Corp. v Unger, 43 NY2d at 777; Hammer v Rosen, 7 NY2d 376, 380). [read post]
20 Feb 2012, 11:46 am by David Oliver
We'll let you know if further light is shed on the matter. [read post]
29 Nov 2016, 11:31 am by Philip P. Mann
I am glad to see that this unfortunate state of affairs is becoming more widely known and a matter of larger concern. [read post]
2 Nov 2016, 8:58 am by Eric Goldman
So, it doesn’t matter that YouTube won most of the points of contention; if any single point of contention fails, YouTube’s 512(c) defense fails This is why repeated plaintiff hammering on prongs like “repeat infringer” and “red flags of infringement” have made 512 opinions longer, more technical and less defense-favorable. [read post]
14 Mar 2011, 7:39 am by PaulKostro
” Brach, Eichler, Rosenberg, Silver, Bernstein, Hammer & Gladstone, P.C. v. [read post]
2 Nov 2016, 12:55 pm by Michael Grossman
Despite it being a fairly minor ordeal, it’s not unusual at all to somehow feel as though the hammer of justice is about to be dropped square on your head. [read post]