Search for: "Matter of Hammer v Hammer" Results 101 - 120 of 443
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Jan 2019, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
Even if John Henry hadn't laid down his hammer and died at the end, he would have just shown that a team of John Henrys would beat a team of steam drills. [read post]
Circuit invalidated that rule on procedural grounds in 2014, holding in Allina Health Services v. [read post]
20 Nov 2018, 7:43 pm by Eugene Volokh
The matter might be different if Congress passed a law allowing recipients to demand that senders stop sending them e-mail of any sort (see, e.g., Rowan v. [read post]
20 Nov 2018, 7:43 pm by Eugene Volokh
The matter might be different if Congress passed a law allowing recipients to demand that senders stop sending them e-mail of any sort (see, e.g., Rowan v. [read post]
14 Aug 2018, 12:01 am by Joanna L. Grossman
Courts began to recognize in the late 1970s that sexual harassment is a form of sex discrimination, a proposition the Supreme Court agreed with in its 1986 ruling in Meritor v. [read post]
9 Aug 2018, 4:00 am by Administrator
Patrick listened to his son’s anguish in dealing with this matter and calmly replied, “I did not hang them, George; the law did. [read post]
21 Jun 2018, 2:29 pm by Daniel Hemel
That is the outcome of the Supreme Court’s 5-4 ruling in Wisconsin Central Ltd. v. [read post]
27 Apr 2018, 3:23 am by Michael Lowe
The Federal Plea Agreement: the Factual Resume In negotiating a plea in federal court, the defense lawyer works with the Office of the Attorney General to hammer out a plea deal. [read post]
19 Mar 2018, 10:23 am by Jordan Brunner
The legislation to authorize DHS has taken three years to hammer out, with considerable difficulty. [read post]
18 Dec 2017, 9:01 pm by Joanna L. Grossman
No, it doesn’t matter whether you intended to offend or harass the women. [read post]
5 Dec 2017, 4:20 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
It is incumbent upon the plaintiff to present expert testimony to support allegations of malpractice (see 530 E. 89 Corp. v Unger, 43 NY2d 776, 777; McDermott v Manhattan Eye, Ear & Throat Hosp., 15 NY2d 20, 24), except where the alleged act of malpractice falls within the competence of a lay jury to evaluate (see 530 E. 89 Corp. v Unger, 43 NY2d at 777; Hammer v Rosen, 7 NY2d 376, 380). [read post]
6 Sep 2017, 7:42 am by Joy Waltemath
The plaintiffs initially argued that SB 4 was preempted in its entirety, but states may regulate certain matters pertaining to immigration. [read post]
1 Sep 2017, 9:00 am by Russell Spivak
First, as it relates to voluntariness: Ruiz marshals United States v. [read post]
29 Aug 2017, 7:31 am by JB
Republicans in the Senate were unable to agree on a measure— no matter how limited—that would command even 50 votes. [read post]