Search for: "Matter of Interstate Stores, Inc." Results 101 - 120 of 136
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Dec 2023, 11:16 am by Eric Goldman
Introduction It’s become a popular political sport to attack TikTok. [read post]
16 Sep 2022, 5:01 am by Jack Goldsmith
It may lead to some interstate travelers being upset, for instance if they are used to the chain's restaurants forbidding (say) patrons from wearing Confederate-flag garb but have to endure seeing it in a jurisdiction that bans ideological discrimination. [read post]
31 Dec 2012, 3:29 pm by Robert B. Milligan
   The South Carolina Supreme Court found that a defendant who allegedly hacked into a plaintiff’s personal e-mail account to retrieve messages that were already read by the plaintiff was not liable under the Stored Communications Act. [read post]
31 Dec 2012, 3:29 pm by Robert B. Milligan
   The South Carolina Supreme Court found that a defendant who allegedly hacked into a plaintiff’s personal e-mail account to retrieve messages that were already read by the plaintiff was not liable under the Stored Communications Act. [read post]
2 Feb 2017, 1:22 pm by Andrew Hamm
App’x 824 (10th Cir. 2007) (wrote opinion) “purely intrastate production of child pornography had sufficient nexus to interstate commerce to give rise to federal jurisdiction” WWC Holding Co. v. [read post]
13 Jan 2017, 9:53 am by Eric Citron
These cases are  American Atheists Inc. v. [read post]
20 Jan 2022, 2:01 pm by John Elwood
As a practical matter, the distinction between rescheduling and relisting is great. [read post]
6 Jan 2015, 10:36 am by Robert B. Milligan and Daniel P. Hart
§ 1831(a) and 1832(a) of the EEA and for “misappropriation of a trade secret that is related to a product or service used in, or intended for use in, interstate or foreign commerce. [read post]
18 Apr 2017, 1:13 pm by Eric Goldman
Recently, the FTC filed its “Complaint Counsel’s Corrected Pre-Trial Brief and Exhibits” in the Matter of 1-800 Contacts, Inc. [read post]
20 Jan 2016, 8:52 am by Abbott & Kindermann
This case includes the following issues: (1) Does the Interstate Commerce Commission Termination Act [ICCTA] (49 U.S.C. [read post]
13 Feb 2024, 11:53 am by Phil Dixon
Thus, the denial of the motion to set aside the judgment was reversed and the matter was remanded for a new trial following a new period of discovery. [read post]
4 May 2015, 4:47 am by Rebecca Tushnet
 “A state law may burden interstate commerce when it ‘has the practical effect of requiring out-of-state commerce to be conducted at the regulating state’s direction. [read post]