Search for: "Matter of Kenneth V."
Results 101 - 120
of 909
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Jan 2022, 2:40 pm
Read, Farley, Melissa, Kenneth Franzblau, and M. [read post]
11 Jan 2022, 9:01 pm
You think you can prevent my candidate from joining the Court and reversing Roe v. [read post]
24 Dec 2021, 12:30 pm
District Judge Kenneth D. [read post]
23 Dec 2021, 7:40 am
In this human trafficking case involving multiple victims, (1) the trial court did not abuse its discretion by allowing the defendant to represent himself; (2) the indictments were sufficient to convey subject matter jurisdiction; (3) the trial court did not err by entering judgments for multiple counts of human trafficking for each victim; and (4) the trial court did not err in determining the defendant’s prior record level State v. [read post]
21 Dec 2021, 9:12 pm
O.L.C. __, at *6 (citing Whitman v. [read post]
12 Dec 2021, 2:22 pm
”) Schwab v. [read post]
2 Dec 2021, 9:28 am
On November 15, 2021, Federal District Judge Kenneth A. [read post]
18 Oct 2021, 6:41 am
A recent Ninth Circuit decision in Thunder Studios v. [read post]
5 Oct 2021, 8:36 am
A bar discipline matter will be argued tomorrow before the Ohio Supreme Court Lorain County Bar Association v. [read post]
1 Sep 2021, 6:01 am
As a procedural matter, a revised U.K. [read post]
15 Aug 2021, 9:30 pm
Article V, §6, in pertinent part, requires that “Appointments and promotions in the civil service of the state and all of the civil divisions thereof, including cities and villages, shall be made according to merit and fitness to be ascertained, as far as practicable, by examination which, as far as practicable, shall be competitive…. [read post]
15 Aug 2021, 9:30 pm
Article V, §6, in pertinent part, requires that “Appointments and promotions in the civil service of the state and all of the civil divisions thereof, including cities and villages, shall be made according to merit and fitness to be ascertained, as far as practicable, by examination which, as far as practicable, shall be competitive…. [read post]
8 Jun 2021, 2:57 am
" Snyder's Lance, Inc. and Princeton Vanguard, LLC v. [read post]
3 Jun 2021, 7:43 am
The news was a little more mixed for petitioner Kenneth Lamont Sanders in Sanders v. [read post]
28 May 2021, 6:39 am
Sanders v. [read post]
24 May 2021, 8:00 am
Kenneth Mack on what the decision meant and why it still matters, in Harvard Law Today. [read post]
23 May 2021, 2:04 pm
” Sandberg v. [read post]
23 Apr 2021, 10:07 am
Unlike the cases cited by the dissent, where the plaintiffs sought publicity regarding the public controversies which were the subject of their litigation (Winklevoss v. [read post]
7 Apr 2021, 12:28 pm
See Michaels v. [read post]
7 Apr 2021, 8:26 am
The Appellate Division addressed this issue in Franco v. [read post]
