Search for: "Matter of Kerr v Kerr"
Results 101 - 120
of 878
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Dec 2020, 4:58 am
In the Supreme Court, Lord Kerr, Lord Sales, Lord Hamblen, Lord Leggatt and Lord Burrows heard the matter. [read post]
12 Aug 2012, 6:19 am
Orin Kerr reviews Fourth Amendment cases from the 2011 SCOTUS term, at SCOTUSBlog. [read post]
14 Dec 2009, 5:57 am
As Kerr recognizes, technology now advances almost monthly, not over decades. [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 10:56 pm
United States v. [read post]
11 May 2010, 3:45 pm
Absolutely right in my view, for reasons I expressed in my long series of blog posts (and for that matter, in my denied petition and reply brief in McCane v. [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 2:20 pm
(Orin Kerr) No, it’s not The Onion — apparently this actually happened. [read post]
25 Jun 2014, 7:37 am
See Ontario v. [read post]
23 Nov 2018, 8:09 am
This week, the UK Supreme Court refused permission to appeal in the matter of Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union v Wightman and others. [read post]
19 Apr 2010, 6:33 pm
(Orin Kerr) At today’s oral argument in City of Ontario v. [read post]
4 Jan 2011, 10:26 pm
(Orin Kerr) Next week, the Supreme Court will be hearing oral argument in Kentucky v. [read post]
3 Sep 2015, 2:26 pm
KERR: That’s exactly right, Justice Kennedy. [read post]
29 Dec 2011, 2:43 am
Under Illinois v. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 3:57 pm
(Orin Kerr) Today’s decision in United States v. [read post]
11 Aug 2011, 4:31 pm
(Orin Kerr) Thanks to Lyle Denniston, I learned today that the Justice Department has just filed its brief in United States v. [read post]
8 Nov 2010, 3:05 pm
Further, past Supreme Court cases have presupposed understandings of the technology: In Smith v. [read post]
1 Jul 2012, 11:01 pm
(Orin Kerr) Back in 2009, I first blogged about an interesting Fourth Amendment case, United States v. [read post]
9 Dec 2008, 11:34 am
And the prosecutors too, for that matter. [read post]
Case Comment: Hesham Ali (Iraq) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2016] UKSC 60 Part Two
13 Mar 2017, 2:42 am
The majority drew upon the case law of the ECtHR (Rodriguez Da Silva, Hoogkamer v Netherlands and Jeunesse v Netherlands). [read post]
26 Aug 2010, 4:41 pm
(Orin Kerr) Here’s one from the “now I’ve seen everything” department. [read post]
31 Aug 2011, 12:50 pm
(Orin Kerr) A few readers have flagged a new district court decision, Clements-Jeffrey v. [read post]
