Search for: "Matter of Lewis v Lewis" Results 101 - 120 of 2,011
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Apr 2010, 9:16 am by Dennis Crouch
On the Concurring Opinions Blog, Professors Magliocca (Indiana) and Miller (Lewis & Clark) have been wondering when the Supreme Court will release its decision on patentable subject matter. [read post]
14 Jul 2011, 10:48 am by Hope Lewis - Guest
United States by Hope Lewis, professor of law at Northeastern University School of Law. [read post]
7 Jun 2013, 12:35 pm
  As a legal matter, I can't say that Judge Gould is wrong to say that's permissible.But I did come away from the opinion with a keen sense that these things matter. [read post]
23 Nov 2011, 7:07 am by scanner1
The Montana Supreme Court has issued an Opinion in the following matter: DA 10-0651, 2011 MT 292, JAMES WYATT SLACK and JOSEPHINE L. [read post]
15 Dec 2006, 5:43 am
The civil union law was promulgated in response to an October 2006 New Jersey Supreme Court decision, Lewis v. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 9:09 pm by Public Employment Law Press
Matter of Lewis v James 2022 NY Slip Op 04066 Decided on June 23, 2022 Appellate Division, Third Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 9:09 pm by Public Employment Law Press
Matter of Lewis v James 2022 NY Slip Op 04066 Decided on June 23, 2022 Appellate Division, Third Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. [read post]
10 Aug 2012, 11:16 am by scanner1
The Montana Supreme Court has issued an Opinion and Order in the following matter: OP 12-0439, 2012 MT 168, MONTANANS OPPSED TO I-166, a Political Committee, SENATOR DAVE LEWIS, Individually, and as an Elected Member of the Montana Legislature, PHIL LILLEBERG, Individually, and as an Owner of FP, INC., a Montana Corporation, Petitioners, v. [read post]
30 Dec 2010, 1:49 am by Lawrence Solum
Here is the abstract: The decision of the Supreme Court of the United States in Bilski v. [read post]