Search for: "Matter of Melendez"
Results 101 - 120
of 167
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Mar 2011, 9:38 am
Along with Melendez-Diaz v. [read post]
1 Mar 2011, 2:42 am
It could have been, and under an objective test, any argument that appears plausible, no matter how hard one has to squint, is good enough. [read post]
26 Feb 2011, 2:52 pm
Sweeney : WHETHER THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS ERRED AS A MATTER OF LAW IN DECLINING TO APPLY MELENDEZ-DIAZ v. [read post]
25 Feb 2011, 11:54 am
On further consideration of the granted issues, 69 M.J. 270 (C.A.A.F. 2010), and the briefs of the parties, it is ordered that the petition is hereby granted on the following additional specified issue:WHETHER THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS ERRED AS A MATTER OF LAW IN DECLINING TO APPLY MELENDEZ-DIAZ v. [read post]
18 Feb 2011, 3:49 am
Didn’t matter; the jury acquitted Melendez-Diaz nonetheless, apparently believing that the cocaine belonged to the two others, and that “constructive possession” stuff was just so much jive. [read post]
14 Feb 2011, 8:00 am
It's completely and utterly fucked up that we, women, can spend such an inordinate amount of time discussing such trivial and irrelevant matters. [read post]
11 Feb 2011, 10:08 am
Melendez-Diaz v. [read post]
11 Feb 2011, 6:49 am
Does it matter if our District's website is the same as the District of Oregon's website? [read post]
25 Jan 2011, 10:42 pm
Four justices in Melendez-Diaz have voiced their dissatisfaction with the "testimonial" approach set forth in Crawford. [read post]
20 Jan 2011, 1:55 pm
For all the fears expressed by the Melendez-Diaz dissenters, the reality is that even for a complex test like DNA matters have settled down so that the number of witnesses who have to testify is quite reasonable.It also bears emphasis that the reason why as many live witnesses testify as do is attributable at least in large part to the demands of the prosecution rather than the defense. [read post]
7 Dec 2010, 7:11 am
Anticipating that, as they have done in Melendez-Diaz and Briscoe, many states will contend that adhering to constitutional procedures would be prohibitively expensive, I have, through a group of student research assistants, conducted a more extensive study of Michigan trials. [read post]
6 Dec 2010, 5:37 am
6th District upholds trial court’s grant of motion to release mother’s mental health records for in camera inspection in child custody matter… 12th District notes than motion to vacate cognivit judgment does not require showing that defendant entitled to relief under one of the grounds enumerated in CivR 60(B)(1) through (5), only needs to show meritorious defense and that motion was timely… Thanks for asking. [read post]
29 Nov 2010, 3:48 am
We’ll see if five people who matter a hell of a lot more to Jason Pepper than I do agree. [read post]
18 Nov 2010, 3:38 am
In fact, a large reason for the Supreme Court’s decision last year in Melendez-Diaz v. [read post]
17 Nov 2010, 5:52 pm
According to a police report, his arrest was ordered by Assistant Chief Ariel Melendez, who had told him not to film police breaking up a fight. [read post]
5 Nov 2010, 12:37 pm
Washington and Melendez-Diaz .Crawford identified when evidence was testimonial which triggered a Confrontation Clause analysis.Fulks points out the calibration certificates should be admissible because they are not testimonial in nature. [read post]
30 Oct 2010, 11:15 am
Melendez v. [read post]
28 Sep 2010, 1:59 pm
This is likely to be a very significant follow-up to Melendez-Diaz, posing the issue of whether forensic lab results may be introduced through a surrogate witness. [read post]
26 Aug 2010, 3:45 am
Virginia, which was to further explore the ramifications of the Court’s decision at the end of the 2008 term in Melendez-Diaz v. [read post]
27 Jul 2010, 12:42 pm
Further elaboration “on the scope of the Second Amendment’s right to bear arms” is sort of going to be necessary, no matter who’s sitting on the Court. [read post]
