Search for: "Matter of Snowden v Snowden"
Results 101 - 120
of 207
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Oct 2017, 2:01 pm
Last time the CJEU reviewed US privacy law, in Schrems v. [read post]
8 Oct 2015, 11:10 pm
Or, alternatively, may and/or must the office holder conduct his or her own investigation of the matter in the light of factual developments in the meantime since that Commission Decision was first published? [read post]
10 Oct 2015, 2:20 pm
It will be far easier to do so as a legal matter. [read post]
9 Aug 2014, 7:00 am
In United States v. [read post]
17 Jul 2020, 8:31 am
From Edward Snowden to Luxembourg The case, Data Protection Commissioner v. [read post]
29 Oct 2014, 4:16 pm
Related Issues: PrivacyCALEAEncrypting the WebLaw Enforcement AccessSecurityRelated Cases: Bernstein v. [read post]
30 Jan 2014, 12:00 pm
Moreover, in Weber v. [read post]
3 Jul 2014, 7:15 am
In 2006, years before the Snowden revelations, the European Court of Human Rights held in Weber v. [read post]
10 Apr 2014, 7:00 am
The resulting conversation dove deeply into key questions such as the relevance and fate of Smith v. [read post]
22 Dec 2014, 8:04 am
On Friday, the Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF), after four years of litigation, shifted its strategy in its banner NSA case, Jewel v. [read post]
16 Dec 2013, 10:22 pm
The two plaintiffs in Klayman v. [read post]
30 Dec 2016, 4:23 pm
Two years post-Snowden the government was still acknowledging previously unknown (except to those in the know) uses of opaque statutory powers. [read post]
30 Dec 2016, 4:23 pm
None of this would have occurred but for the 2013 Snowden revelations of the scale of GCHQ’s use of bulk interception powers. [read post]
17 Jun 2014, 4:56 am
As a practical matter, the secrecy shrouding the FISA process renders it impossible for a defendant to meaningfully obtain relief under Franks absent a patent inconsistency in the FISA application itself or a sua sponte disclosure by the government that the FISA application contained a material misstatement or omission. [read post]
5 Sep 2014, 7:27 am
Here’s the introduction: In June 2014, the Supreme Court handed down its decision in Riley v. [read post]
13 Nov 2019, 11:20 am
See United States v. [read post]
1 Jan 2014, 7:04 am
Will we let EU politicians turn PRISM, TEMPORA and Snowden into an excuse for an information trade war with the USA? [read post]
18 Feb 2018, 10:36 am
That indictment occurred at an awkward time for the Obama administration, in the midst of the aftermath of the Snowden revelations. [read post]
2 Dec 2016, 12:01 pm
Related Cases: Jewel v. [read post]
23 Sep 2016, 6:02 pm
We provide the url here as a convenience, but recommend strongly against adding additional CAs to your browser: https://aplits.disa.mil/processAPList.action Related Cases: EFF v. [read post]
