Search for: "Matter of State of New York v Pierce"
Results 101 - 120
of 144
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Oct 2011, 4:59 pm
., Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc., and Morgan Stanley & Co., Inc., (the Firms) sued news aggregator (pdf) Theflyonthewall.com (Fly) for copyright infringement and for committing the New York state law tort of “hot news” misappropriation. [read post]
16 Oct 2011, 6:42 pm
GRIMSLEY, Appellant, v. [read post]
2 Sep 2011, 4:30 am
§ 77r(b)(1)(A), “Covered securities” include securities “listed, or authorized for listing, on the New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”). [read post]
2 Sep 2011, 4:30 am
§ 77r(b)(1)(A), “Covered securities” include securities “listed, or authorized for listing, on the New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”). [read post]
31 Aug 2011, 10:27 am
In particular, because of the Supreme Court’s recent opinion in AT&T Mobility LLC v. [read post]
25 Aug 2011, 9:27 am
District Court, Southern District of New York (Manhattan). [read post]
25 Aug 2011, 9:10 am
In April 1997 and again in 2003, the New York Stock Exchange and FINRA (then the NASD) recommended that brokers subject to three or more complaints within a five year period ought to be placed upon heightened supervision. [read post]
25 Aug 2011, 8:36 am
District Court, Southern District of New York (Manhattan). [read post]
25 Aug 2011, 8:36 am
District Court, Southern District of New York (Manhattan). [read post]
12 Aug 2011, 2:55 am
" In McCulloch v. [read post]
23 May 2011, 9:25 am
Two decades before Smith, Wisconsin v. [read post]
15 Mar 2011, 3:00 am
Samsun then registered the earlier decision with the New York state courts, which had the effect, under New York law, of making the federal court’s judgment a New York state judgment. [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 1:04 pm
New York New York University, 2006. [read post]
1 Jan 2011, 1:14 pm
" * State v. [read post]
12 Nov 2010, 11:04 am
In the Matter of Thomas Hughes v. [read post]
6 Oct 2010, 1:08 pm
New York Times v. [read post]
4 Oct 2010, 5:47 am
Supreme Court's decision this year limiting the extraterritorial application of U.S. securities laws in Morrison v. [read post]
14 Jul 2010, 11:41 pm
Mayor of New York, 92 U.S. 259 (1876); Chy Lung v. [read post]
27 May 2010, 9:43 am
Generally, a party seeking to pierce the corporate veil must show: (1) complete domination and control of the subsidiary by the parent with respect to the transaction at issue; and (2) that such domination was used to commit a fraud or wrong against the plaintiff that resulted in the plaintiff's injury (see Matter of Morris v New York State Dept. of Taxation & Fin. , 82 NY2d 135, 141 [1993]; Do Gooder Prods., Inc. v American… [read post]
9 May 2010, 9:14 pm
United States v. [read post]
