Search for: "Matter of Wiggins" Results 101 - 120 of 144
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Aug 2011, 8:25 am by Bexis
 Precisely as Schindler held courts shouldn’t do, Wiggins treated expert “opinions” that the screws should not break until whenever fusion occurs (if at all) as a matter of “sufficiency of the evidence. [read post]
19 Aug 2011, 9:07 am by McNabb Associates, P.C.
Douglas McNabb and other members of the U.S. law firm practice and write extensively on matters involving Federal Criminal Defense, INTERPOL Red Notice Removal, International Extradition and OFAC SDN List Removal. [read post]
3 Jun 2011, 4:30 am
Wiggins, 304 Ark. 484 (1991), the Arkansas Supreme Court held that an action is commenced by filing a complaint and completing service upon a defendant in accordance with the Arkansas Rules of Civil Procedure. [read post]
3 Feb 2011, 2:11 pm by Bexis
A few weeks ago a regular reader, and occasional correspondent, Prof. [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 4:15 am
Citing the Court of Appeals ruling in Wiggins v Board of Education, 60 NY2d 385, the Appellate Division said that because there was no written designation appointing the hearing officer, the appointing authority “lacked jurisdiction” to maintain the initial disciplinary proceeding” against Perez.The decision is posted on the Internet at:http://www.courts.state.ny.us/reporter/3dseries/2011/2011_00306.htm===================For additional information about concerning… [read post]
6 Dec 2010, 8:26 am by Larry Bodine
Other behaviors perceived as arrogant include: Having little experience on the other side of a matter Excluding general counsel in client communications Not including junior members of a company's in-house legal team. [read post]
18 Nov 2010, 2:21 pm by Albert Wan
 Wiggins, 539 U.S. at 521 (internal quotation marks omitted). [read post]
18 Nov 2010, 4:36 am by Steve Lombardi
It isn’t a matter of the Court reading something into the Constitution; it’s a matter of an aggrieved party presenting the issue to the Court for review and interpretation. [read post]
9 Nov 2010, 3:17 am
” The Appellate Division annulled the determination and remitted the matter to the county “for a new hearing and determination with respect to the charges. [read post]
8 Nov 2010, 6:57 am by Gideon
What matters is the penalty phase of proceedings: the battle to show that there is yet reason to show mercy. [read post]
29 Oct 2010, 6:00 am
Wiggins, J., joins divisions I and III(A) of this special concurrence and Hecht, J., joins this special concurrence in its entirety. [read post]
28 Oct 2010, 6:00 am
Wiggins, J., joins divisions I and III(A) of this special concurrence and Hecht, J., joins this special concurrence in its entirety. [read post]
2 Aug 2010, 3:28 pm by Kent Scheidegger
"The issue is a matter of decorum and judgment," Wiggins argued. [read post]
17 May 2010, 6:13 pm
The court concluded that Ernst had been denied a fair and impartial tribunal because the Chair of the County Board of Supervisors had (a) met with the county’s attorneys “to discuss the pending investigation;” (b) met with the employees involved; (c) signed the notice of the charges against Ernst; (d) voted to bring charges against Ernst; (e) served as a witness at the disciplinary hearing and (f) voted to accept a hearing officer’s findings of guilt and impose the… [read post]