Search for: "Matter of William P."
Results 101 - 120
of 1,643
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 May 2023, 6:30 am
Moreoever, it assured what I have taken to calling our own “hundred years war” generated by the resistance of Indigenous Nations to the conquests necessary to make what William Freehling called “the Midwest Purchase” more than a formal reality. [read post]
17 May 2023, 7:51 am
Climate change is a looming threat that includes rising sea levels, unpredictable storms, and the destruction of seaports.[1] Island nations are at risk of economic collapse since they rely on ports for almost all their trade.[2] When Hurricane Dorian struck the Bahamas in 2019, the severe storms damaged ports causing a loss of approximately $3.4 billion.[3] Additionally, natural hazards are the costliest for ports in the Philippines, Guinea-Bissau, Dominica, the Northern Mariana Islands, and… [read post]
7 May 2023, 1:44 pm
A judge's standing orders generally include various instructions to lawyers about procedural matters; here's an item from p. 4 of the 10-page standing orders from Judge Ana Reyes, newly appointed to the U.S. [read post]
5 May 2023, 4:12 am
It’s no longer a matter of ‘if’ but ‘how’ businesses incorporate ESG factors into their strategic, operational, and tactical initiatives. [read post]
1 May 2023, 7:46 am
During the hearing details of a settlement between Prince William and NGN emerged. [read post]
26 Apr 2023, 2:39 pm
I wrote about this episode in my 2017 article, SCOTUS After Scalia (starting at p. 135): In a scene too remarkable to imagine, President Washington "started up in a violet fret. [read post]
25 Apr 2023, 2:27 pm
Attorney Karen P. [read post]
25 Apr 2023, 2:25 pm
Attorney Karen P. [read post]
15 Apr 2023, 4:47 pm
Google Earth helpfully showed me that an accessible parking spot is two stores away, in front of Sherwin Williams. [read post]
6 Apr 2023, 10:51 am
William D. [read post]
6 Apr 2023, 10:36 am
Conversely, it would be improper for a district court to permit a matter to proceed to trial on the basis of vague and unidentified theories. [read post]
2 Apr 2023, 10:34 am
Jeffrey P. [read post]
22 Mar 2023, 10:00 pm
*This is the third post in a symposium on William Araiza’s Rebuilding Expertise: Creating Effective and Trustworthy Regulation in an Age of Doubt. [read post]
21 Mar 2023, 11:13 am
Representing Arizona and other intervening states, Rita P. [read post]
15 Mar 2023, 8:23 am
The case is being supervised by Thomas P. [read post]
6 Mar 2023, 1:41 am
Warby LJ, with whom Sharp P and Singh LJ agreed, held that Steyn J had been correct in principle to reconsider the issue of serious harm in relation to the period after Ms Cadwalladr’s public interest defence fell away. [read post]
3 Mar 2023, 6:55 pm
Thus it is not either text or objectives, but application that matters for commentary. [read post]
25 Feb 2023, 6:50 pm
And there is the matter that the anonymous critic was offering a criticism that was also not peer reviewed. [read post]
21 Feb 2023, 6:41 am
See also Memorandum from William H. [read post]
