Search for: "Matthews v. Matthews" Results 101 - 120 of 5,390
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Feb 2024, 12:33 am by INFORRM
There was also an extension application by the Claimant and an application by the Defendant for strike out and/or summary judgment before HH Lewis in the case of Matthews v Wakefield Metropolitan District Council KB-2023-002991. [read post]
26 Feb 2024, 12:28 am by centerforartlaw
”[4] Matthew Butterick, an attorney for the artists alongside Joseph Saveri noted that the judge “sustained the plaintiffs’ core claim pertaining to direct copyright infringement” and expressed optimism in the claim’s path to trial and the ability to address the court’s concerns.[5] On November 29, 2023, the artists and their legal team submitted an amended complaint, 94 pages to the original complaint’s 44, adding seven artist-plaintiffs: Gerald… [read post]
19 Feb 2024, 1:45 am by INFORRM
On the same day Collins Rice J will hand down judgment in the case of WFZ v BBC. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 4:00 am by Administrator
This week, the ONCA released their decision in Westover Estate v. [read post]
4 Feb 2024, 4:40 pm by INFORRM
On the same day, judgment was handed down in Blake & Anor v Fox [2024] EWHC 146 (KB). [read post]
2 Feb 2024, 1:39 pm by Matthew Ackerman
* The following blog is an adaptation of the presentation Alan Ackerman and Matthew Ackerman gave on “The Fundamentals of Easement Valuation” at the American Law Institute’s Eminent Domain & Land Valuation Litigation Seminar in New Orleans on February 1, 2024. [read post]
2 Feb 2024, 6:05 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Defendant Matthew Funk, Esq. was the primary attorney handling her case. [read post]
1 Feb 2024, 7:00 am by Norman L. Eisen
Expand all Collapse all Relevant State Court Proceedings State of New York v. [read post]
30 Jan 2024, 9:02 pm by renholding
I dissent from the Commission’s denial of a petition to amend Rule 202.5(e), our so-called gag rule.[1]  This de facto rule follows from the Commission’s enforcement of its policy, adopted in 1972, that it will not “permit a defendant or respondent to consent to a judgment or order that imposes a sanction while denying the allegations in the complaint or order for proceedings. [read post]
29 Jan 2024, 4:35 pm
Cheers, Matthew Markushttps://www.pembient.com https://www.linkedin.com/in/matthewmarkus I always prefer honest answers and this was what we got. [read post]