Search for: "Maxwell v. United States"
Results 101 - 120
of 241
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 May 2014, 6:16 am
United States, in which the Court is considering the scope of Congress’s treaty power, and contends that the Chief Justice’s opinions in cases involving foreign affairs “might have lasting significance for foreign relations law that rivals or even surpasses” those of other Justices regarded as leaders in the field. [read post]
9 May 2014, 11:24 am
United States and Maxwell v. [read post]
8 Apr 2014, 5:25 pm
RUTAN, Appellant, v. [read post]
24 Feb 2014, 11:19 am
It appears that Merck KGaA (MK) alleged that MSD had infringed its trade mark in the United Kingdom and, while it's not stated explicitly in the note received by this Kat, it looks as though there had been use of the mark but that MSD was arguing that it was a use that was permitted under the terms of the agreement, since MSD was arguing here that the agreement was governed by New Jersey law. [read post]
5 Feb 2014, 12:24 pm
Sheppard v. [read post]
5 Feb 2014, 4:30 am
In Ross v. [read post]
24 Dec 2013, 5:45 am
(Designers Guild Ltd. v. [read post]
16 Dec 2013, 8:41 am
She entered the United States on September 27, 2013. [read post]
7 Dec 2013, 8:00 am
Jane posted a summary of two United States Signals Intelligence Directives (USSID) continuing Lawfare’s coverage of the latest ODNI declassification trove. [read post]
23 Sep 2013, 7:37 am
Faleomavaega Panel 7 — Policing Violence against Indian Women — Sarah Deer, Christi Belcourt, Sam Hirsch Panel 8 — Tribes, States, and Taxes — Gabriel Galanda, Shana Barehand, Mary Streitz Break-out Panel 1 — United States v. [read post]
22 Aug 2013, 4:00 am
Ltd. v. [read post]
16 Jun 2013, 3:02 am
Plaintiff was also granted leave to file an amended complaint setting out a RLUIPA claim.In United States v. [read post]
22 Apr 2013, 11:55 am
The first was United States v. [read post]
21 Apr 2013, 3:20 pm
There again, the peculiarly interesting state of trade mark law in the United Kingdom and, not far beyond it, in the territory of the European Economic Area, might be closer to the cause. [read post]
21 Sep 2012, 5:47 am
These two counts charged Laiwala with violating California Penal Code § 115(a), which provides as follows:Every person who knowingly procures or offers any false or forged instrument to be filed, registered, or recorded in any public office within this state, which instrument, if genuine, might be filed, registered, or recorded under any law of this state or of the United States, is guilty of a felony.People v. [read post]
30 Aug 2012, 9:39 pm
” United States v. [read post]
20 Aug 2012, 3:07 am
KF 1609 K75 2012 International trade law and domestic policy : Canada, the United States, and the WTO / Jacqueline D. [read post]
5 Aug 2012, 9:01 pm
United States. [read post]
1 Aug 2012, 9:06 am
In 2002, Atkins v. [read post]
25 Jul 2012, 6:13 am
http://bit.ly/LC6ujJ (Mark Ross) Managing Big Data Behind the Firewall: Part 2 - http://bit.ly/PlCXuI (Tom Jenkins) Microsoft Upgrades the Microsoft Outlook Configuration Analyzer Tool – http://bit.ly/PC419b (Casper Manes) Navigating California’s Data Breach Notification Statute - http://bit.ly/LyALjf (Edward Ho, Andres Hurwitz) New Article in ABA Antitrust Magazine Contrasts EU-US Proposals for New Privacy Framewrok - http://bit.ly/LCdI7d (Winston… [read post]
