Search for: "May Reed"
Results 101 - 120
of 5,077
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 May 2012, 8:32 am
After removing a complaint filed against National Penn Bank (the “Bank”) to federal court, Reed Smith attorneys Andrew J. [read post]
22 May 2011, 12:00 pm
In Courtroom 1, Gale and another v Serious Organised Crime Agency is to be heard by Lords Phillips, Brown, Mance, Judge, Clarke, Dyson and Reed. [read post]
10 Nov 2015, 9:40 am
How may advances in personalized medicine change the face of the industry? [read post]
15 Jun 2012, 8:33 am
You may remember Reed. [read post]
9 May 2008, 12:49 am
IP barrister Jeremy Reed of Hogarth Chambers gave an enlightening talk on software patents and recent legal developments. [read post]
8 Jun 2009, 7:01 pm
A recent article by my colleagues Mike Reed and Tony Lovensheimer explains that when determining whether to [...] [read post]
25 Dec 2018, 5:22 am
Sean Hermanson on "Rethinking Implicit Bias" Where tenure-stream faculty at the U.S. top 20 (2017-18) got their PhDs Reed College capitulates to mindless 18-year-olds Privacy on the Internet, and with Google and Gmail in... [read post]
20 Aug 2009, 1:07 pm
The high profits of Reed Elseiver (owners of Lexis Nexis) may be unsustainable. [read post]
12 Sep 2008, 8:01 am
Our experience is that city dwellers in America in both court systems selected from the master jury list may be less likely to show up for duty in the first place. [read post]
20 May 2015, 6:02 am
BrannJudge Brann did emphasize, however, that while an expert may rely on IME reports, the expert’s opinion testimony must still satisfy the usual evidentiary requirements, such as the hearsay rule, before the opinion may be admitted into evidence.A copy of this decision by Judge Brann can be viewed online HERE.I send thanks to Attorney James Beck of the Philadelphia office of the Reed Smith law firm for bringing this case to my attention. [read post]
6 Jun 2024, 2:41 pm
Law360 covered the topic in an article on May 15, 2024 where Gray Reed Partner Joshua Smeltzer was one of the experts interviewed. [read post]
5 Nov 2012, 7:00 am
A pedestrian crash may be caused by any number of factors including inattentive, impaired, or negligent drivers. [read post]
15 Apr 2013, 10:05 pm
The Richmond commonwealth's attorney's office has dealt with Reed nearly a dozen times in recent years on a variety of charges, but most were dropped because of witness problems.This may, or may not, explain why there has been such a problem with witnesses:... [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 10:11 am
John Reed of DLA Piper provides some additional analysis on the El Paso decision and what it may mean for boards and potential banker conflicts: -bjmq [read post]
16 May 2011, 1:15 pm
Webinar – Business Start-Up and Going to the Next Level May 19, 2011 Everyone has a great idea, but do you have access to the resources to make it happen and then succeed? [read post]
30 Nov 2012, 8:24 am
Prior to joining Reed Smith, Travis was an Enforcement Counsel with the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, U.S. [read post]
24 Apr 2010, 2:10 am
In the case of serious offenses, especially involving distribution of illegal drugs, we will also call the police--in accordance with the implementation plan--and you may be arrested and charged with a crime. [read post]
18 Jul 2012, 2:16 pm
Though huge publishers such as Reed Elsevier, Wolters Kluwer, and Thomson Reuters may poo poo things, we’re seeing a trend. [read post]
28 Oct 2014, 3:00 am
Reed, 31 Cal. 4th 657 (2003), the California Supreme Court held that: 1) transfers of real property under a Marital Settlement Agreement (“MSA”) may be fraudulent transfers under the Uniform Fraudulent Transfer Act (“UFTA”); 2) for purposes of determining insolvency, the value of future child support should not be considered; and 3) unearned income is not an asset for purposes of the UFTA unless it is subject to levy by a creditor. [read post]
28 Oct 2014, 3:00 am
Reed, 31 Cal. 4th 657 (2003), the California Supreme Court held that: 1) transfers of real property under a Marital Settlement Agreement (“MSA”) may be fraudulent transfers under the Uniform Fraudulent Transfer Act (“UFTA”); 2) for purposes of determining insolvency, the value of future child support should not be considered; and 3) unearned income is not an asset for purposes of the UFTA unless it is subject to levy by a creditor. [read post]
