Search for: "Mays v. Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs" Results 101 - 120 of 166
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Feb 2015, 6:23 am by Doorey
Rare is the occasion when we pay attention to a workerscompensation ruling. [read post]
21 Nov 2014, 11:22 am by Cynthia L. Hackerott
In addition, the proposal would not cover: (1) educational institutions; (2) almost all construction contractors; (3) state and local governments; and (4) possibly TRICARE subcontractors (given the five-year moratorium on enforcement of the obligations related to affirmative action programs and recordkeeping of all TRICARE subcontractors set forth in Directive 2014-01, effective May 7, 2014). [read post]
29 Sep 2014, 6:33 am by Joy Waltemath
About a month later, on May 19, the sales rep was advised by her supervisor and an HR representative that the company was discontinuing the NBE program and that she would be returning to her MAE position. [read post]
1 Jul 2014, 5:00 am by Michael M. O'Hear
S. 438, 461 (2002); see Director, Office of WorkersCompensation Programs v. [read post]
6 Jan 2014, 11:20 pm by Kevin LaCroix
The world of directors and officers liability has long been characterized by rapid change. [read post]
7 Nov 2013, 11:46 am by Cynthia L. Hackerott
Whatever doubts there may have been, it is clear that the OFCCP has now adopted, and is implementing, the sex stereotyping theory in its enforcement efforts. [read post]
4 Nov 2013, 9:46 am by Jane Chong
To dismiss these distinctions is to contribute to an increasingly contrived dichotomy, between those who see the uniqueness of software as an argument for exempting software programs from traditional liability rules altogether, and those who stress that software is nothing special to claim that the road to software vendor liability lies in traditional contract or tort remedies. [read post]
6 Jun 2013, 8:15 am by Jon Gelman
http://workers-compensation.blogspot.com/ Workers' Compensation: OSHA Needs To Be Strengthened Mar 31, 2013 If workplaces were safer then there would be no reason to have a workers' compensation program at all. [read post]
5 Mar 2013, 1:51 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
Since the Supreme Court’s June 28, 2012 National Federation of Independent Business v. [read post]
28 Dec 2012, 5:00 am by Jon Robinson
Stevedoring Services of America, the court determined that it would no longer give Chevron deference to the Director of the Office of WorkersCompensation Program’s litigating positions, and that employers and carriers must pay compound interest (instead of simple interest) if interest is owed pursuant to Section 14 of the Longshore and Harbor WorkersCompensation Act. [read post]
20 Dec 2012, 7:00 am by James F. Aspell
10 Myths and Facts About Workers' Compensation Posted by LexisNexis Workers' Comp Law Community Staff The LexisNexis WorkersCompensation Law Community and the award-winning blog Work Comp Roundup have teamed up to present some common myths and facts about workerscompensation. [read post]