Search for: "McDonald v. McDonald" Results 101 - 120 of 2,817
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Mar 2023, 9:08 am by Stephen Halbrook
Thompson/Center Arms Co., and has filed briefs in a vast number of other cases, including the NRA's party brief in McDonald v. [read post]
10 Mar 2023, 4:30 am by Lawrence Solum
If Heller could have been characterized as a “minimalist” opinion at the time of its decision and McDonald v. [read post]
8 Mar 2023, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
The Appellate Division opined: "A municipal resolution is, in general, a unilateral action that is temporary in nature and, thus, it does not create any vested contractual rights", citing Matter of Aeneas McDonald Police Benevolent Assn. v City of Geneva, 92 NY2d 326. [read post]
8 Mar 2023, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
The Appellate Division opined: "A municipal resolution is, in general, a unilateral action that is temporary in nature and, thus, it does not create any vested contractual rights", citing Matter of Aeneas McDonald Police Benevolent Assn. v City of Geneva, 92 NY2d 326. [read post]
7 Mar 2023, 2:01 pm by Kevin LaCroix
Vice Chancellor Laster’s March 1, 2023, opinion in the case, dismissing the claims against the McDonald’s directors, can be found here. [read post]
1 Mar 2023, 12:04 pm by Steve Bainbridge
In January, I noted considerable concern over a decision by Delaware Vice Chancellor Travis Laster involving potential Caremark liability for McDonalds due to allegations of a pervasive atmosphere of sexual harassment. [read post]
23 Feb 2023, 7:07 am by Eleonora Rosati
Nestle v Cadbury [2022] EWHC 1671 (Ch) (July 2022)You can’t trade mark a colour. [read post]
19 Feb 2023, 5:21 pm by INFORRM
Canada On 15 February 2023, judgment was handed down in McDonald v Goranko, 2023 BCSC 231 (CanLII). [read post]
6 Feb 2023, 9:01 pm by renholding
For example, in 2020, the Delaware Court of Chancery addressed both prongs of Caremark in the Teamsters v. [read post]