Search for: "McGinnis v. State"
Results 101 - 119
of 119
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 May 2014, 7:44 am
For example, the New Deal/Civil Rights legacy may well give new support to religious conservatives, like Michael McConnell, who argue that the pervasive state interventionism of the modern era require a change in the constitutional base-line for assessing religious access to public facilities and subsidies. [read post]
7 Nov 2024, 7:52 am
They preserve the revolution precisely by transposing the revolutionary performance from outside the constitutional state (and thus a threat to it) to become a method, a performance of the revolutionary trajectories now in the service of constitutional stability, or at least solidity. [read post]
15 May 2009, 7:49 am
McGinnis, 352 F.3d 382 (2d Cir. 2003), Sotomayor wrote an opinion that reversed a district court decision holding that a Muslim inmate’s First Amendment rights had not been violated because the holiday feast that he was denied was not a mandatory one in Islam. [read post]
20 Sep 2010, 10:38 am
Co. v. [read post]
14 Jun 2022, 2:29 pm
(2021) Donald Drakeman, The Hollow Core of Constitutional Theory: Why We Need the Framers (2021) Jamal Greene, How Rights Went Wrong: Why Our Obsession With Rights is Tearing America Apart (2021) David Schwartz, The Spirit of the Constitution: John Marshall and the 200-Year Odyssey of McCulloch v. [read post]
9 Aug 2021, 5:59 am
In Pomeroy v. [read post]
4 Jun 2017, 1:06 pm
John McGinnis, Rappaport's frequent co-author, states that colorblindness was the “core ideology of the Republican Party” while inexplicably lamenting that it may no longer be so. [read post]
20 Nov 2011, 12:12 pm
In this article the case of McCulloch v. [read post]
14 Jan 2007, 9:03 pm
The Articles of Confederation required unanimous consent of all the states for constitutional amendments and for complicated reasons [read post]
4 Jul 2024, 1:06 pm
(2021) Donald Drakeman, The Hollow Core of Constitutional Theory: Why We Need the Framers (2021) Jamal Greene, How Rights Went Wrong: Why Our Obsession With Rights is Tearing America Apart (2021) David Schwartz, The Spirit of the Constitution: John Marshall and the 200-Year Odyssey of McCulloch v. [read post]
21 Mar 2023, 7:01 am
(2021) Donald Drakeman, The Hollow Core of Constitutional Theory: Why We Need the Framers (2021) Jamal Greene, How Rights Went Wrong: Why Our Obsession With Rights is Tearing America Apart (2021) David Schwartz, The Spirit of the Constitution: John Marshall and the 200-Year Odyssey of McCulloch v. [read post]
19 Oct 2015, 11:22 am
Supreme Court held in Twombly v. [read post]
31 Oct 2010, 12:30 pm
The ratification debates and Federalist Papers can be supplemented by evidence of ordinary usage and by the constructions placed on the Constitution by the political branches and the states in the early years after its adoption. [read post]
19 Feb 2012, 8:55 pm
The ratification debates andFederalist Papers can be supplemented by evidence of ordinary usage and by the constructions placed on the Constitution by the political branches and the states in the early years after its adoption. [read post]
7 May 2023, 6:00 am
The ratification debates and Federalist Papers can be supplemented by evidence of ordinary usage and by the constructions placed on the Constitution by the political branches and the states in the early years after its adoption. [read post]
2 May 2010, 3:23 am
There were, for example, questions as to whether McGinnis lied about his true intentions to MacDonald in order to maintain the unfettered access to MacDonald that McGinniss enjoyed. [read post]
19 Jul 2009, 2:07 pm
The ratification debates and Federalist Papers can be supplemented by evidence of ordinary usage and by the constructions placed on the Constitution by the political branches and the states in the early years after its adoption. [read post]
16 Mar 2008, 10:41 am
The ratification debates and Federalist Papers can be supplemented by evidence of ordinary usage and by the constructions placed on the Constitution by the political branches and the states in the early years after its adoption. [read post]
17 May 2022, 9:47 am
Bipartisan bills in the House and Senate seek to reclaim Congress’s role in determining when the United States uses force abroad. [read post]
