Search for: "Meanes v. State"
Results 101 - 120
of 68,701
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Mar 2009, 1:03 am
The Court granted the State's petition for review without oral argument in this Hays County assault case on the following issue: Arevalo v. [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 12:39 pm
There has been much discussion in the news, blogosphere, and general ruminations about the Supreme Court's January opinion in United States v. [read post]
7 Aug 2015, 7:28 am
For that reason, well-known cases like United States v. [read post]
17 May 2011, 2:05 am
Bartlett and others v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions Case (C-537/09); [2011] WLR (D) 158 “The mobility component of disability living allowance constituted a special non-contributory benefit within the meaning of article 4(2a) of and Annex IIa to Council Regulation (EEC) No 1408/71 as amended by Council Regulation (EC) No 118/97 and Parliament and Council Regulation (EC) No 631/2005, and of Council Regulation (EEC) No 1408/71 as amended by Parliament and… [read post]
27 Feb 2010, 1:00 pm
” Now United States v. [read post]
23 Jan 2019, 7:20 am
See, State v. [read post]
14 Dec 2022, 1:54 pm
State v. [read post]
7 Oct 2010, 9:12 am
In Sanchez v. [read post]
10 Oct 2006, 2:07 pm
Thanks SCOTUSBlog for putting up the link to the oral argument transcript in United States v. [read post]
30 Jun 2020, 9:19 pm
Supreme Court issued a much-anticipated opinion in a trademark case directed to what it means for a trademark to be generic, and hence not subject to registration, in United States Patent and Trademark Office v. [read post]
1 Dec 2008, 7:40 pm
See eBay Inc. v. [read post]
4 Jun 2010, 5:03 am
Well, they did; in State v. [read post]
17 Jul 2009, 7:55 am
The SCC has solidified that shift with R. v. [read post]
2 Jan 2013, 12:25 pm
Last Fall Steve posted about United States v. [read post]
26 Nov 2018, 7:15 am
” At a more fundamental level, the dispute in Dawson is about the meaning of McCulloch v. [read post]
23 Feb 2019, 12:57 am
So, the full case against Times v. [read post]
27 May 2019, 4:35 pm
Judgment Warby J cited the relevant principles on meaning from paras 11 to 12 of Koutsogiannis v The Random House Group Ltd [2019] EWHC 48 (QB). [read post]
27 Apr 2012, 3:10 am
Seldon v Clarkson Wright & Jakes (Secretary of State for Business, Innovation and Skills and another intervening); [2012] UKSC 16; [2012] WLR (D) 124 “A rule providing for the compulsory retirement at 65 of partners in a firm of solicitors could be justified as a means of achieving legitimate aims relating to recruitment and promotions within the firm. [read post]
3 Mar 2009, 2:11 am
Ruttle Plant Hire Ltd v Secretary of State for Environment Food & Rural Affairs (No 3) [2009] EWCA Civ 97; [2009] WLR (D) 75 “A ‘notice of an amount of the debt’ within the meaning of s4(5) of the Late Payment of Commercial Debt (Interest) Act 1998 did not have to be correct before the court [...] [read post]
30 Jul 2010, 2:44 am
Seldon v Clarkson Wright & Jakes (Secretary of State for Business, Innovation and Skills intervening) [2010] EWCA Civ 899; [2010] WLR (D) 206 ”A rule providing for the compulsory retirement at 65 of partners in a firm of solicitors was a proportionate means of achieving legitimate aims relating to recruitment and promotions within the firm. [read post]
