Search for: "Mechanical Contractors v. State"
Results 101 - 120
of 613
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Sep 2007, 7:31 am
Inland Construction Company v. [read post]
6 Dec 2016, 8:20 am
The Chamber and its allies tried to create a mechanism where government contractors found guilty of fraud could escape punishment. [read post]
23 Apr 2010, 1:31 pm
In the case of General Excavation, Inc. v. [read post]
3 Oct 2018, 8:07 am
., Inc. v. [read post]
12 Jul 2019, 6:00 am
Co. of Am. v. [read post]
19 Jun 2014, 1:00 am
Land Development Specialities, LLC v. [read post]
30 Jul 2008, 12:00 am
Finnegan had subcontracted with Chapman Mechanical. [read post]
20 May 2013, 7:43 am
Controls, Inc. v. [read post]
2 Mar 2015, 4:00 am
However, the bank wanted the subcontractors to take a haircut on their invoices and release their mechanics liens. [read post]
2 Oct 2016, 11:15 am
Blackwood Contractors Ltd, the Newfoundland and Labrador Court of Appeal held that the charge against the holdback under s.12(5) of the Newfoundland and Labrador Mechanics’ Lien Act (the NL Act) is the same as, and “parasitic” to, the lien against the land. [read post]
11 Dec 2006, 1:10 pm
State College Electrical & Mechanical, Inc., d/b/a Allied Mechanical & Electrical Contractors, a subsidiary of S&A Custom Built Homes, Inc. and Berrena's Mechanical Services, LLC, a Single Employer (6-CA-34619; 348 NLRB No. 80) State College, PA Nov. 30, 2006. [read post]
1 Jan 2019, 7:00 am
In Commonwealth v. [read post]
8 Aug 2011, 9:27 pm
M/V Ya Mawlaya, 99 F.3d 717, 722 (5th Cir. 1996); United States v. [read post]
14 Aug 2012, 4:55 pm
Even with a written assignment, the different state laws and state legislation prevent contractors from securing the ownership of all federally funded inventions, thereby preventing the federal government from implementing a uniform policy. [read post]
21 Nov 2019, 12:03 pm
Dyer v. [read post]
12 Jun 2015, 7:38 am
Dyer v. [read post]
21 Nov 2019, 12:03 pm
Dyer v. [read post]
16 Jun 2016, 6:39 pm
United States ex rel. [read post]
31 Jan 2019, 3:32 pm
Although the classification status of Uber and Lyft drivers has been hotly litigated in state and federal courts for nearly a decade, given this recent decision, it seems unlikely that a finding of employment status of these drivers under another statute (using, for example, California’s independent contractor test under Dynamex v. [read post]
19 Jan 2011, 10:46 am
Second, the terms of the tender contract itself created a “reasonable objection” discretionary mechanism for refusal to carry a bid. [read post]
