Search for: "Medical Board of California v. Superior Court" Results 101 - 120 of 153
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
The cases, listed newest to oldest, and the Court’s summaries are as follows: Union of Medical Marijuana Patients, Inc. v. [read post]
8 Oct 2008, 11:50 am
Superior Court, 920 P.2d 1347, 1351 n.2 (Cal. 1996); Brown v. [read post]
The cases, listed newest to oldest, and the Court’s summaries are as follows: Union of Medical Marijuana Patients, Inc. v. [read post]
8 May 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Rosenbaum, Amanda Mangaser Savage, Kathryn Eidmann and Sarah Camiscoli of the bar of the State of the State of LA, California, of counsel), for appellants.Letitia James, Attorney General, New York (Mark S. [read post]
8 May 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Rosenbaum, Amanda Mangaser Savage, Kathryn Eidmann and Sarah Camiscoli of the bar of the State of the State of LA, California, of counsel), for appellants.Letitia James, Attorney General, New York (Mark S. [read post]
30 Aug 2010, 1:17 am by Kelly
(Docket Report) District Court N D California: Reasonable royalty damages for indirect infringement not limited to ‘Specific Acts of Infringement’: Tyco Healthcare Group LP d/b/a Vnus Medical Technologies v. biolitec, Inc. et al. [read post]
4 Sep 2007, 2:47 am
Miller, No. 05-5235 Denial of habeas petition is reversed where the only evidence identifying a criminal defendant as the perpetrator is the testimony of a single witness, and where the memory of that witness is obviously impacted by medical trauma and the all-important identification is altered after the administration of medical drugs, the failure of defense counsel to consider consulting an expert to ascertain the possible effects of trauma and pharmaceuticals on the memory of… [read post]
17 Dec 2008, 7:16 pm
Grape, No. 07-3682 District Court order allowing the Government to forcibly medicate defendant, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. section 1291, is affirmed where the Government has presented sufficiently important interests to forcibly medicate defendant, an incarcerated paranoid schizophrenic charged with child sex offenses. [read post]
The cases, listed newest to oldest, and the Court’s summaries are as follows: Union of Medical Marijuana Patients, Inc. v. [read post]