Search for: "Medina v. United States"
Results 101 - 120
of 229
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Nov 2011, 2:28 pm
Some of his clients were Cuban nationals who arrived without official documentation in the United States. [read post]
23 Oct 2011, 7:27 am
Monday 24 October: United States v. [read post]
20 Oct 2011, 6:30 pm
On Monday CAAF will hear oral argument in United States v. [read post]
20 Oct 2011, 6:18 pm
United States, 10-9746 (ditto); and Wesevich v. [read post]
9 Oct 2011, 8:04 am
Unites States v. [read post]
3 Oct 2011, 9:40 am
United States v. [read post]
25 Sep 2011, 3:00 pm
” United States v. [read post]
3 Sep 2011, 8:01 am
United States v. [read post]
16 Aug 2011, 7:15 am
AS-10-CV-860-XR, but my review of the docket on PACER indicates that United States District Judge Xavier Rodriguez ordered the case remanded to the 38th District Court of Medina County, Texas on June 27, 2011. [read post]
15 Aug 2011, 9:03 am
United States v. [read post]
11 Aug 2011, 5:50 pm
United States v. [read post]
United States v. Fosler: CAAF holds Article 134 adultery sample specification fails to state offense
8 Aug 2011, 11:53 pm
Is Parker v. [read post]
15 Jun 2011, 12:47 pm
SEE UNITED STATES v. [read post]
27 May 2011, 4:04 pm
Combs, No. 08-1056 (Medina, J.) [read post]
25 May 2011, 7:35 am
” The Los Angeles Times editorial board urges Congress to “rectify” the “unjustifiable anomaly” that Supreme Court Justices are exempt from the Code of Conduct for United States Judges. [read post]
24 May 2011, 7:34 am
United States it vacated a Federal Circuit decision and held that when, to protect state secrets, a court dismisses a contractor’s prima facie valid affirmative defense to the government’s allegations of breach of contract, a proper remedy is to leave the parties where they were on the day they filed suit. [read post]
17 May 2011, 12:39 pm
(2) Whether United States v. [read post]
15 May 2011, 12:23 am
UNITED STATES, AND THIS COURT’S RECENT OPINIONS IN MEDINA, MILLER AND JONES. [read post]
6 May 2011, 2:33 pm
Medina, 68 M.J. at 590 (citations omitted); United States v. [read post]
6 May 2011, 10:39 am
UNITED STATES, AND THIS COURT’S RECENT OPINIONS IN MEDINA, MILLER AND JONES. [read post]
