Search for: "Michael Bill v. The State of Texas" Results 101 - 120 of 552
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Jun 2021, 3:08 pm by Ilya Somin
The anti-commandeering doctrine originated in the 1842 Supreme Court case Prigg v. [read post]
1 Feb 2021, 11:26 am by Michael Lowe
State Electronic Surveillance Laws As for state law, Texas and the other states can enact their own electronic surveillance laws. [read post]
18 Jan 2021, 5:00 am by Josh Blackman
ABA Model Rule 8.4(g) in the States, 68 Catholic University Law Review 629 (2020). [read post]
8 Jan 2021, 10:17 am by Jeffrey Mitchell
Simington to the FCC on December 8, 2020, replacing Commissioner Michael O’Rielly. [read post]
9 Dec 2020, 3:41 pm by Jonathan H. Adler
Accordingly, Texas submitted several filings, led by a Motion for Leave to file a Bill of Complaint, which is basically the way a state seeking to invoke the Court's original jurisdiction asks the court for permission to file. [read post]
24 Nov 2020, 12:02 pm by Michael Lowe
  Among these state laws are two provisions of Chapter 32 of the Texas Penal Code, which outlaws various forms of fraud. [read post]
9 Nov 2020, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
Texas, but the state most implicated is best known for neither movie studios nor rodeos but peaches. [read post]
22 Sep 2020, 9:01 pm by Sherry F. Colb
This term, the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) in Jones v. [read post]
22 Sep 2020, 4:00 am by James Romoser
Texas, which is scheduled to be argued in November. [read post]
30 Jul 2020, 9:05 pm by Joshua Burd
Supreme Court’s Department of Homeland Security v. [read post]
16 Jul 2020, 12:58 pm by Peter Margulies
U.S. asylum officers are in the main dedicated and capable, but judicial review of asylum decisions at the U.S. border is exceedingly limited—limits that the Supreme Court upheld on June 25 in Department of Homeland Security v. [read post]
10 Jul 2020, 4:11 am by James Romoser
” In an op-ed in the New York Times, Michael McConnell argues that the court’s three recent decisions on religious freedom (Espinoza v. [read post]