Search for: "Michael T. Parker" Results 101 - 120 of 322
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Jul 2019, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
CNN Doesn’t Tell Whole Story About Trump-Loving Panel San Francisco Chronicle – Paul Fahri (Washington Post) | Published: 7/17/2019 The panel of women CNN interviewed about President Trump liked him a lot and do not think he is a racist, despite a congressional resolution to the contrary. [read post]
14 May 2019, 7:29 am by Andrew Hamm
” Welcome, Michael, and thank you for participating in this question-and-answer exchange. * * * “Have you got any candidates? [read post]
18 Apr 2019, 3:44 am by Edith Roberts
This blog’s analysis of Tuesday’s argument in Parker Drilling Management Services. [read post]
17 Apr 2019, 7:01 pm by Andrew Siegel
On Tuesday, the Supreme Court heard oral argument in Parker Drilling Management Service, Ltd. v. [read post]
2 Apr 2019, 4:31 pm by Gritsforbreakfast
I am not a lawyer, but wasn't this officer in essence admitting to using Class C misdemeanor arrests to get around the Michael Morton Act and Brady v. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 2:44 pm by admin
INTRODUCTION On September 28, 2004, the United States Supreme Court granted a property owner’s application for leave from a Connecticut Supreme Court decision upholding the constitutionality of the community’s taking of property with the specified purpose of creating jobs by selling the property to a private industrial user.1 As the petitioner land owners in Kelo express in their brief requesting leave, the critical question for the Court to determine is whether a taking for purely… [read post]
1 Feb 2019, 10:37 am by Adam Faderewski
• James Francis Parker, 72, of Dallas, died January 26, 2019. [read post]
1 Feb 2019, 10:37 am by Adam Faderewski
• James Francis Parker, 72, of Dallas, died January 26, 2019. [read post]
25 Dec 2018, 9:30 pm by Series of Essays
Uber and the Future of Regulation April 26, 2018 | Reeve T. [read post]
6 Nov 2018, 1:49 pm by Howard Knopf
The Parker Commission recommended this in 1935, and the government of day approved it for reasons that are essentially just as valid today as they were more than 80 years ago.How can it help small businesses to potentially have to negotiate separately with SOCAN and RE:SOUND who have millions a year to spend on legal fees and other costs associated with collective administration and pushing revenues up? [read post]